Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

Cox Bill Increases July 2008

The Cox May bill includes an insert that gives notice to customers about July 2008 rate increases. The notice says, "new rates for pay-per-use calling features effective 7/1/08.

California's Telco Deregulation Fiasco: Finding Alternative Phone Service in a Competitive Wasteland

Your telephone rates have increased by between 70-276%.....in just the past year. From a few years ago, we are looking at 1000% price increases. Remarkably, many consumers aren't even aware of these price shocks. And when they find out, they feel helpless to do anything about them. They're partly right thanks to irresponsible regulatory oversight. But there are some ways to fight back..............read on.

 

AT&T and Verizon raise phone rates while claiming the need for less regulatory oversight due to increased competition

It's funny how phone companies that lobby regulators for "pricing flexibility" only seem to move their prices in one direction: up. "Flexibility" implies the ability to flex in multiple directions, and while I recognize it's just another fancy lobby-speak term, it's time to call it what it really is: "price increasing flexibility." It's certainly flexible, because the respective company may decide to raise a particular rate 3% or 300%, but make no mistake, there will be no downward flexing.

As if it were a surprise, the phone giants are raising rates again, some by as much as 300%. This USA Today story points to a growing source of criticism. While the largest telecom companies continue to lobby for decreased regulatory oversight on the basis of increased competition, their phone service rates are rising. In California, phone companies have been largely deregulated since late 2006, but as this chart from TURN shows, major service providers such as AT&T and Verizon have increased rates over and over again. Basic economics tells you that in a competitive marketplace prices should fall...so what can you do? Ditch your landline phone. Internet phones can provide a wider variety of services at a fraction of the cost of traditional landline phones. Using your cell phone as your primary phone can also be cheaper than maintaining a landline phone.

75-year-old granny brings hammer down on Comcast

Mona Shaw did to her cable and phone company what many of us only fantasize about ... More

Three tough consumer Advocates and a snarling consumer watchdog
If only Mona Shaw had known about
the UCAN Fraud Squad ...

 

FCC Accused of Unfairly Providing Secret Information to the Major Phone Companies

According to the Los Angeles Times, the Government Accounting Office says the FCC is giving inside information to major phone companies. When corporate moguls inside the "beltway" are given private information, it provides an unfair advantage to pitch what they want to legislators who unknowlingly are lead to believe the companies are smart enough to read their minds. The crime is that it gives consumers no advantage. It's as if a powerful person in a lawsuit has access to the judge to learn what he/she is thinking and to take this unique opportunity to establish a decision before the "common person" and his/her counsel have a chance to present the case. In the case of the FCC, lobbyists working with any FCC officials in secret discussions result in both the FCC and the lobbyists cheating the system. The article relates a couple of instances where an FCC staff person was fired in 2000 for leaking documents to a lobbyist. There's a legal time for discussion and a time where all parties are to keep their mouths, meeting notes and other means of communications on an issue totally silent.

Can the common person or the major company provide the most money in contributions and other special events? This question needs no answer in words because this answer is crystal-clear in almost all decisions made over the past few years where rulings are in favor of big industry and not the rest of us.

Changes at AT&T May Change Your Phone Plan--Get Info in Advance

Your AT&T phone plan may be changing. This link directs you to the September 2007 rate changes. It includes information on what services and plans have changed or are obsolete whether you liked what you had or not. For example, an AT&T residential and business service was withdrawn as of 9/19/07. Up until that day, you were always able to call and get the "time of day". It's discontinued. Click on the link to see other changes to plans and services you once enjoyed. Mergers did bring us one thing and it wasn't market competition between companies. Mergers brought us reduced company choices, increased technology and marketing, increased "hold" times for customer service, fewer regulations to protect consumers and a great deal of billing confusion for customers who were "migrated" from "old AT&T" (Legacy T) to the "new AT&T. Check your bills very closely to make sure every service on your bill is exactly what you ordered. If not, write a letter to the company ASAP instead of calling and contact the UCAN Fraud Squad at 619-696-6966 or fill out a complaint form online and one of us will email and/or call you.

Harassing phone calls from 800-684-8429, HSBC Bank, aka Orchard Bank

Have you been receiving debt collection phone calls and messages from 800-684-8429? If so, you are not alone. A UCAN member recently filed a complaint regarding incessant phone calls and messages she had received about someone else's debt from the number 800-684-8429. The calls appear to be made on behalf of HSBC Bank, or Orchard Bank, a banking and credit provider. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, debt collectors must honor any request to cease telephone communication and contact you only in writing.

Internet phone company comparison and review: What can Ashton Kutcher get you?

Remember when Al Gore flicked the Internet on and we were all promised free phone service within 6 months? What happened to that? Politicians, I tell ya...when are we going to learn? Fortunately, there are people looking to make good on the promise to rob traditional landline customers form the Baby Bells by exploiting the Interent in order to offer free local and long distance phone service to deprived consumers across the country. Deprived...seriously. While the Baby Bells might argue against the term "deprived," UCAN begs to differ. The amount of competion in the local/long-distance marketplace is laughable. The Bells were broken up because of monopoly-type conditions, but mergers and acquisitions have steadily consolidated market power back into the hands of a select few. A new wave of Internet-exploiting phone companies could help change all that. Some you've heard of, like Skype, others are still beta testing (Ooma). Read more.

Sunrocket VOIP Closes Down -- Consumers Fume

On July 19th, VOIP provider Sun Rocket (www.sunrocket.com) announced it was terminating its service. Consumers fumed.....especially those that had plunked down up to $200 for a prepaid annual contract of low-cost VOIP service.

To the company's credit, it arranged deals with other VOIP companies to take over the contracts of its customers. While some customers reported losing VOIP service, the majority appeared not to have suffered loss of phone service. However, quite a few customers reported that they'd prepaid for an annual contract and these new service providers were not honoring those contracts. They were angry and felt ripped off.

The closure came without any warning. Even people working at the company report being surprised by the news. Many didn't find out until the day they reported to work and noticed that the phones weren't ringing at their office: the company's call center had been shut down but the CSRs weren't told! Yet, people in the industry knew that Sunrocket was struggling to find a buyer and had been repeatedly failing.....in part because of the liabilities posed by the annual contracts that had been prepaid.

The good news is that for those customers who paid the annual fee and now have nothing to show for it, some credit card companies are agreeing to refund the money for the unused service. Chase, in particular, is reported to be crediting customers' account. It is likely others will as well. There's some good information about what former Sunrocket customers can do to get their money back and/or switch to other VOIP providers. In particular, check out:

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/r18686213-SR-Bankrupt-Recap-What-T...

 

 

PEW report confirms broadband Internet is a privilege of the wealthy and educated

Broadband Internet is apparently a class-based utility, a privilege of the wealthy and educated. There has been a lot of talk about the Pew Internet and American Life Project's release of its latest study on home broadband adoption. Some groups have used the opportunity to focus on immediate trends in racial, ethnic, age, and rural vs. urban adoption of broadband internet service. However, there are two larger, more important "big picture" issues that should not be ignored, and are essential to assessing the current broadband Internet situation in the United States.

1) The Internet is still a class based utility and service, readily available in the best quality to the wealthy and highly educated, and only marginally available to those who are poorer and less educated.

2) American broadband Internet service continues to lag behind the world in connection speeds, overall penetration of the population, and price.

The clearest divide in adoption of broadband among groups in the United States is along economic and educational lines. For instance, 76% of Americans with an annual income above $75,000 have broadband Internet connections, compared to only 30% of those with an income of $30,000 or less. As to education, 70% of Americans with a college degree have broadband Internet connections compared to 21% of those without a high school degree.

This highlights the fact that while there is legitimate concern about "net neutrality" (ensuring websites and services being treated fairly and equally by the network providers who connect websites and Internet services and their users) in terms of those who are already seated at the Internet table, there are still large gaps in the of the population not even connected to the Internet. While the Internet may not be a physical necessity like water, it is either quickly becoming, or already has become, like electricity, a social, cultural, and (perhaps most importantly) an economic necessity to be a full part of modern society in a developed country.

This is especially true for young people. Unfortunately, this gap in access for the economically and educationally underserved is eerily reminiscent of our two tiered, apartheid educational system.

Even taken as a whole, it is no secret that America is lagging behind broadband connection speeds and penetration rates worldwide. For instance the PEW study shows 71% of Americans have internet connections of any type, and only 47% have broadband connections. Another study from May of 2007, by ITIF, shows broadband penetration in the U.S. at similar levels, or .51 subscribers per household. The leading nations are South Korea with a rate .90, Iceland with a rate of .83, and the Netherlands with a rate of .73 per household. So the leading nations have broadband penetration rates higher than even the United States total Internet penetration rate.

The average broadband connection speed in the United States is 4.4(mbps) (DSL and Cable in the US are significantly slower than this), versus 61.0 in Japan, 45.6 in Korea, 21.7 in Finland, and 18.2 in Sweden.

And if you think users are paying premiums in these countries for higher speed broadband connections, think again. Cost per 1 mbps in the U.S. is $3.33. Cost in the countries listed above is as follows; Japan- $0.27, Korea- $0.45c, Finland- $2.77, and Sweden- $0.63.  Read More

 



Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved