Home

Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amount.  Click here to visit our secure donation page.

Cingular Customer Service Case 2002-2007

After 5 years of litigation, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a settlement between UCAN and AT&T Mobility, formerly Cingular Wireless, that will result in over $18 million worth of refunds for certain former Cingular customers and over $12 million in penalties. The case amounts to a total victory of over $31 million for California consumers.

Watch a video of the CPUC decision or read the story here. For more information, see our Issue Center dedicated to the case. Remember, UCAN is a non-profit consumer protection organization and our efforts to protect California consumers with our small staff are funded by the grassroots donations of members like you, so JOIN TODAY!

Read the case history below and follow the links below to all related legal filings, news, and other documents.

UCAN has established that Cingular Wireless engaged in illegal and shoddy sales and service practices during the 2000-2002 time frame -- many of which may be continuing even today. On July 3, 2002, UCAN set its sights upon Cingular Wireless. UCAN pushed for and intervened in a regulatory inquiry into Cingular sales and service practices. Hearings were held before the CPUC in April 2003. In September 2003, the PUC Judge issued a decision supporting almost all of UCAN's recommendations. Not surprisingly, Cingular appealed the Judge's ruling.

On September 23, 2004, the CPUC adopted fined Cingular Wireless $12.14 million for violation of laws governing telecommunications carriers and ordered restitution to affected customers. Cingular appealed the CPUC decision. UCAN filed an opposition to the appeal. This matter was hung up in the Courts for a year or two. In the meantime, customers who deserve refunds of the improperly assessed Early Termination Penalties during the 2000-2002 time period went without the refunds. Until March 15, 2007, the "Schwarzenegger" CPUC had refused to require the carrier to give the refunds that were ordered by the "Davis" CPUC. Now UCAN has prevailed in this major victory after 5 years of litigation. Read the various documents from the case to your right.

 

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless -


Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved