Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

AT&T, arguably the world's worst phone company, is offering stand-alone DSL

UCAN In the Media

AT&T to offer 'naked' DSL for far less than before
Consumer representatives wonder if the service will be too slow to attract customers

Ryan Kim, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

See original article from the Chronicle here

After rolling out a form of stand-alone DSL service last year that offered customers nominal savings, AT&T is set to try it again with a new, unbundled broadband plan that will provide customers with a relatively affordable alternative for high-speed Internet service.

Customers will soon be able to pay $19.95 per month for broadband service without having a phone line from AT&T. Or, customers can pay $10 a month for DSL service when it is bundled with a phone plan, which start at about $15 per month with taxes and surcharges.

The change means AT&T customers can separate their broadband access bill from their phone bill, if they so choose. For instance, if customers choose the "naked" DSL option from the phone giant, they can either rely on their cell phones entirely and save some on their phone bills or they can try out other home Internet phone services, like Vonage or Skype.

The new prices, which go into effect sometime in the next 12 months, reflect an agreement AT&T struck with the Federal Communications Commission, which made the price cuts a condition of AT&T's merger with BellSouth when the deal was approved Dec. 29. When the service begins, the pricing will remain for 30 months.

The naked DSL offer will provide download speeds of up to 768 Kbps, the slowest tier of DSL. Upload speeds will be half that.

"We said all along the merger between AT&T and BellSouth would result in consumer benefits and this is an example of that," said AT&T spokesman John Britton.

AT&T began offering DSL last year to satisfy conditions of its 2005 merger with SBC. But while AT&T was required to offer unbundled service for two years, the FCC did not set pricing guidelines.

So in June, AT&T began offering unbundled, 1.5-Mbps DSL service for $45, which was practically the same price as a bundle of DSL and phone service.

Consumer advocates are ambivalent about AT&T's naked DSL commitment.

Michael Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, said he's pleased that AT&T is finally offering an affordable version of stand-alone DSL. But he said the speed AT&T is offering will make it difficult to do heavy media downloading and will make it hard to achieve high-quality Internet phone service performance.

"I think it's a mixed bag," Shames said. "There are a lot of consumers that are moving to (Internet telephone service), but I don't think they'll be satisfied at those speeds."

Mindy Spatt, spokeswoman for The Utility Reform Network, said that with the lower tier of service, it seems like AT&T is trying to steer people to faster speeds, which are still better priced when purchased in a bundle.

"Certainly it's hard to imagine there will be a huge rush of consumers; for many of customers, it's like going backward in time to a slower connection," Spatt said. "The bottom line is AT&T wants to sell you a bundle. Even with this merger condition, that's still their goal."

 

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless - Landline - VoIP -
Money & Privacy Money Saving Tips -
Internet & Media Broadband ISPs - Network Neutrality -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

2 1/2 years & 4 collection agencies from At&t/Bell South

Changed to bell south 2 yrs ago,asked to keep same #,3 weeks later,while just out of hospital,family trying to call could not reach me,so called neighbor. Thinking that my phone was out of order,I called Bell Soutj,was told that I was not with them(they were going by my phone #) asked 3 different people,was assured that I did not have Bell South telephone. Called another company,got hooked up,then got a 3 month bill later with internet charges added. Never had internet with them. Tried to call & get things striaght several times,kept swithing me to another dept,finally the 'fraud dept! I have gotten 3 collection notices from 3 different agencies,sent info of my internet & phone bills & dates,with explaination,now the 4th collection agency is calling. This is over 2 years old,what can I do to get this striaght? How many collection agencies can they force me to prove that I don't owe them? Is there a limit? I'm elderly & this upsets me. Thanks for any help.

ATT/Bell South/Cingular - don´t use them if you can avoid it!

I´ve had problem after problem with ATT/Bellsouth/Cingular. They have added services I didn´t ask for several times. If you have to have them, you need to check your phone bill with a fine-tooth comb every month. Some of these extra charges they will credit, if you complain enough. Every time you find a new service on your bill that you didn`t ask for, you have to ask them to disconnect it and ask them to give you a credit for it.

They have come to the door and had my roommate sign to add a service, without asking me, the account owner. They did not even tell her, when she signed that they were adding a service, they told her she was signing to have them lower the bill. They then added the service without my approval or knowledge. My roommate was so busy she forgot to tell me about it, and I found out about it, when I got my bill and called them. My roommate is not related to me and her name is not on the account at all.

I called April 28th to have my Internet services disconnected April 30th, they told me they would and then didn`t disconnect it. I thought they had made a mistake on the bill, just to find out, it was actually still connected. A new tenant had long moved in.

ATT is a company without integrity, they will try to make money in any way they can. I`ve never experienced anything like it with any other phone company.

I have to say this was in South Florida, an area known for scams anyway. The only good experiences I´ve had with this company was the Internet technical department, they were great with helping to trouble shoot any internet connection problems. They were honest, they never lied to me or misrepresented any information.

Unfortunately the customer service/sales team appears to be trained to lie/misrepresent things. Do not believe what they tell you!

A few years ago I had ATT in Oregon and never had a problem with them though.

AT&T is the WORST company i

AT&T is the WORST company i have ever dealt with. They have the most incompetent employees and the most inefficient structure of any company i have ever known. They have wasted days of my life, literally stolen money from me though charging for services i didn't ask for, for assuring me of things that weren't true and through countless other 'mistakes'. There representatives are rude, ignorant and their managers are just as bad.

i was told i couldnot have a

i was told i couldnot have a telephone or dsl through bellsouth due to other peoples bills who lived at this adress before me there a really unfair company i think now im stuck with no phone or dsl

ATT does offer stand alone service

I too wanted to switch to Vonage but was told that I needed to cancel my DSL service with ATT to do so. I called ATT and was told that I could not have DSL service with them anymore. Three different persons told me this. After calling one last time to make sure that this is true, I was advised by another customer service agent that ATT do offer the stand alone service. She said you must have DSL ULTRA or higher to qualify though. Basically put, the other agents do not know what they are talking about. I signed up for the stand alone service and I went ahead and switched to Vonage. You have to be persistent because alot of the agents do not know about this service. The agent told me that this agreement started just last month, which is just August so some agents are still not fully aware of it. You might need to tell them specifically about it and insist that you speak to a supervior. The DSL representatives know about this change, not the residential service.

Hope this helps.

I inquired with Bell South

I inquired with Bell South (now ATT) for stand alone dsl connection. They told me it is not available in my area. After reading all this I don't know who is telling the truth. I want to use Vonage for my phone service but I have to have stand alone connection for the dsl. Please help

Switch to Vonage? I wouldnt advise that! Use another voip

I went through all the issues noted here on this blog. Nightmares. But the worst was dealing with Vonage.
They offerd two free months and then billed me beginning the day I made the call to sign up.
Then you have to call in to cancel...cant do it online...they transfer you to some pro who hammers the hell out of you not to cancel and then blackmails you by saying if you cancel today Im charging your card another $93.00.
DONT USE VONAGE!!!

I am having the same problem

I am having the same problem with BellSouth, now AT&T. I've already signed with Vonage and now i'm told by AT&T that I can't get stand alone DSL. I am going to call AT&T again and remind them of the FCC requirement!

Stand-alone DSL

The reason no one knows of the service in California is because the low prices you see advertised are for AT&T Bell South merger customers. California's company is called SBC and has nothing to do with the Bell South merger conditions. The California Public Utilities Commission's priority is making business happy and providing every opportunity for business to grow with optimum profits. Stand-alone DSL in California is available IF someone wants to pay top dollar for it. The only other option is to swtich as many services as possible to AT&T/SBC to get the lower prices and special promotions. However, bundling all of your services is counter-intuitive to the words stand-alone DSL AKA "SAD". The bottom line is CA and 12 other states merged with SBC and none of us are entitled to the approximate $20 stand-alone DSL at this point and time. Whether or not CA and the other 12 states get these perks, remains to be seen.

SAM

Huh? SBC isn't Bell South?

SBC stands for Southern Bell Communications, which IS the same company as Bell South. The agreement that AT&T made with the FCC, in order for the merger/acquisition to be approved, was to offer all AT&T customers "naked" DSL at a set price for set amount of time. Since the merger/acquisition was approved by the FCC and all SBC customers are now AT&T customers, the service absolutely MUST be provided. If the associate you speak to at AT&T doesn't know this, ask to speak to a supervisor. If the supervisor doesn't know, escalate beyond them.

Whoever posted the comment that this comment is in response to clearly didn't read the information provided by the links at the bottom of this article.

That's right - SBC isn't Bell South.

SBC stood for Southwestern Bell, which acquired a number of Bell operating companies over the years (including Pacific Bell in California) and in 2005 purchased AT&T Corp, assuming the better-known name as its own in the process. In 2006, the new AT&T acquired BellSouth. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T#Bell_Operating_Companies

ATT Naked DSL

No one at A T & T knows of this service. They tell consumers they must already have a phone number to attach the DSL to.

dsl service should be offered stand-alone

the following link gives a email summary sent by the FCC itself of the FCC decision, which requires for two years, from October 2005, that AT&T must provide unbundled dsl.

  • FCC decision on SBC-ATT merger
  • Some state public utilities commissions also made requirements for stand-alone dsl.

  • State conditions for stand-alone dsl
  • California Public Utilities Commission conditions for stand-alone dsl
  • Post new comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <p> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!--break-->
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

    More information about formatting options




    Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

    Utility Consumers' Action Network

    (619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

    Terms & Conditions

    UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

    That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

    See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved.