Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

Telecommunications

Law & Policy

Legal Filings

Issues

FCC Communications Consumer Protection and Empowerment Proceeding

The FCC recently sought comment concerning what actions need to be taken to ensure consumers of wireless, broadband, and video services are well informed about: the costs associated with the services; the contracts consumers must enter into; the charges for which consumers are billed; and the methods for resolving billing issues.

Telepacific charges for calls never made -- blame the phone company or hackers?

Imagine you are small business and you get a bill from your local phone company company for $1000. You are shocked because your monthly bill is usually closer to $100 per month. The company claims that your higher bill is for the international calls that you made from your fax machine. "Hold on", you think. "I didn't make any international calls from my fax machine or from ANY phone. I didn't make any international calls at all!"

You protest but the phone company says that even though you didn't make the calls, someone was able to hack into your phone system and make the calls. "But wait", you exclaim, "I don't have a phone system. I don't have a PBX. I just have two phone lines provided by you".

"Ah, but you didn't take precautions to protect your phones from being hacked," responds the phone company.

"What precautions!", you reply. "I put international call blocking on my phone service".

An impossible scenario? Apparently not accordingly to Telepacific/MPower. It did almost exactly this to a San Diego-based flower shop. Read our complaint about this shocking practice.

Cramming Requirement Revisions in California

The CPUC is considering revising the rules regarding reporting of unauthorized charges for telecommunications services. Learn about the proposed changes as well as UCAN's position and legal filings on the issue.

Sprint Nextel illegally billing taxes, fees, and text message charges on data broadband services plans

UCAN has filed a federal class action complaint against Sprint Nextel (aka Sprint Solutions) for illegally billing customers taxes, fees, and text message charges on data services plans. You can read the complaint here.

AT&T International Wireless Roaming Overcharges and Cramming

AT&T's practice of enabling international roaming without customer notification violates the CA Public Utilities Code, which is intended to protect consumers from "cramming" of unauthorized charges. AT&T customers are also being charged for calls that were never placed. UCAN asserts that these customers never sought nor authorized international roaming as a service provided in connection with their cellular phone service.

California Lifeline/Universal Lifeline Telephone Service

California Lifeline, formerly known as Universal Lifeline Telephone Service (ULTS), provides discounted basic residential (landline) telephone service to low-income households.

MCI Long Distance Charges

UCAN's complaint, filed with the California Public Utilities Commission, details how MCI added surcharges to the bills of local phone customers in violation of California law. MCI's new long-distance "Basic Monthly Fee" is being imposed on those customers who use MCI's local phone service...but don't use MCI long-distance.

Ringtone and text message rip-offs

Of all the new features and capabilities of today's cell phones, UCAN receives the most complaints about ringtones and text messages. Our issue center contains all sorts of valuable information from consumer guides and updates to lawsuits and settlements against major cell phone providers. Come inside and see for yourself!

Cingular Customer Service Case 2002-2007

UCAN established that Cingular Wireless engaged in illegal marketing and customer service practices from 2000-2002 and filed a suit in July 2002. The case dragged on for years, but in was worth the wait. In 2006, a CA Court of Appeals judge ruled against Cingular and upheld a CPUC decision to hit Cingular with a large fine for its unconscionable actions. Get all the details inside our issue center.

Undergrounding

From SDG&E to SBC, get the real story on undergrounding in San Diego inside this issue center.

News

Game changer or small step? Skype and Truphone apps appear on cell phones including the Iphone and Android G1

Is the appearance of cheap, IP based voice services on cell phones like Skype and Truphone on cell phones a game changer or a small step?

New York Times features UCAN Phone Study to show wireless phone costs are misleading

On March 26th, New York Times columnist Bob Tedeschi featured UCAN's phone cost study to highlight the difficulty in assessing phone costs.  He focused on the wireless aspects of our report but he totally "got" the message.  He calculates that, for example, if you were on a calling plan where you paid an average of 26 cents a minute and you switched to a prepaid plan charging 10 cents a minute, a new phone would pay for itself after about 167 minutes of calling rather than 560 minutes of calling on a "bucket plan".

His conclusion is spot-on correct..... the cell phone companies can be doing a much better job in helping consumers navigate the actual costs for phone service.   What he didn't add was that regulators should be doing more to push wireless carriers to start fully disclosing actual cost data about wireless phones.   Tedeshci's article is worth reading (see below) but you don't need to read the article to get the point:  if you don't use all of your bucket of minutes on your cell phone every month, you may be better served by looking carefully at pre-paid wireless plans.  The UCAN study referenced by the NY Times can be found here.

San Diego citizen journalism and media discussion forum

UCAN's affiliate New Media Rights is hosting a discussion forum on the future of media and journalism in San Diego.  Join in on the discussion now!

Lines You Didn't Know You Had

checking for phone lines and telecom features you're paying for but didn't know you had

Response to Chris Reed's opinion of UCAN in "America's Finest Blog"

Union-Tribune Opinion Editor Chris Reed has slammed UCAN because he dislikes our 87-page report that exposes flaws in the deregulation of the telephone industry. Unfortunately, Mr. Reed's blogs are magically preventing readers from posting comments.  You can't view our rebuttal at Chris Reed's blog, but you can read it here.

Videos

Sprint Pioneer

Hack Your Cell

Featured



Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved