It's Official: AOL's customer service stinks

UCAN News

 

 

AOL gets official recognition!

It is no secret that America Online (AOL) is probably the most hated Internet Service Provider in the Free World. But now, a Zogby poll proves what we all suspected. Two stories are reproduced below. The first is from the Consumerist, and the second is from MSN Money.

AOL Tops MSN Money's Customer Service Hall Of Shame

The Consumerist -

Earlier this week, MSN Money published the results of a national Zogby poll they commissioned on who delivers the worst customer service. The winner was AOL, ranked "poor" by 47% of respondents, while Comcast came in second with 42% suckage. Sprint ranked third at 39%.

"We've seen a fall in customer service as we've gone into a recession," says a customer service consultant in the article. "As the cost cutting occurs . . . they start to cut the wrong things." But that implies that AOL had good customer service before the recession, doesn't it? Wait, what?

All but one of the top 10 companies are either in communications or finance, with the one weird exception of Abercrombie & Fitch (4th place, 38%).

The MSN Customer Service Hall of Shame

Karen Aho, MSN MONEY -

Four 'winners' from MSN Money's inaugural list are back -- 3 with scores even worse than last year's. See the 10 companies Americans love to hate.

By Karen Aho

The economy's in the tank. Corporate profits are down. Business owners are having just as hard a time getting loans as wannabe homeowners.

So you'd think that businesses would be treating their patrons like royalty, right? That this would be exactly the right time for businesses to coddle their customers?

Wrong. When the economic going gets tough, some companies apparently get tough-minded about customer service, squeezing out the last dime of profit by cutting back on critical customer-facing positions such as phone personnel.

"We've seen a fall in customer service as we've gone into a recession," said Richard D. Hanks, the president of Mindshare Technologies, a customer-service consulting company. "As the cost cutting occurs . . . they start to cut the wrong things."

That reality is borne out in the results of MSN Money's second annual Customer Service Hall of Shame, a ranking of companies with the worst customer service, based on a nationwide survey commissioned by MSN Money and conducted by Zogby International. The scores for our Hall of Shame companies are, on average, down from a year ago.

And the 'winner' is . . .

The company at the bottom of the customer-service heap is Time Warner's AOL. A remarkable 47% of people who had an opinion of AOL's customer service said it was "poor." Analysts said that rating may have something to do with its effort to transition from an Internet service provider -- where it still has more than 9.3 million paying subscribers -- to an ad-supported Web portal.

 

"I don't know what to attribute that to," AOL spokeswoman Dori Salcido said. "I just do know that we continue to improve customer service."

AOL fits squarely in the category of company that dominates our list: communications companies and banks that provide complex and at times highly technical products. Tens of millions of customers rely on those products almost hourly. And, should something go wrong, those customers get anxious and demand a fix -- now.

 

That's still no excuse, analysts say. In their zest for quarterly profits, these companies tend to favor acquisitions over beefed-up service staffs. They also lean toward confusing fees over straightforward price increases -- strategies that don't play well for the long haul.

"Most of these companies actually aren't thriving," said Michael Shames, the executive director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network, a California nonprofit that monitors business practices. People don't look at companies with poor customer-service scores and say, "Here's where I should invest," he said.

 

For the survey, conducted online in March, Zogby asked more than 7,000 people across the country to rate their customer experiences with 140 leading companies in 14 industries, including airlines, hotels, insurance companies and big-box stores such as Wal-Mart. Respondents could answer "excellent," "good," "fair," "poor," "not familiar" or "not sure."

The companies in the Hall of Shame were ranked by the percentage of people familiar with a company who answered "poor."

Although AOL didn't get ranked last year, corporate sibling Time Warner Cable did, and it made the top 10 then and now, receiving a 29% and 31% "poor" response, respectively. Time Warner Cable was one of four companies -- along with Comcast, Sprint Nextel and Bank of America -- to make a repeat showing.

The Hall of Shame

1. AOL's response. Post your experiences here.

 

2. Comcast's response. Post your experiences here.

3. Sprint Nextel's response. Post your experiences here.

4. Abercrombie & Fitch's response. Post your experiences here.

5. Qwest's response. Post your experiences here.

6. Capital One's response. Post your experiences here.

7. Bank of America's response. Post your experiences here.

8. Time Warner Cable's response. Post your experiences here.

9. HSBC Finance's response. Post your experiences here.

10. Cox Communications' response. Post your experiences here.

Click here to see the full list of companies.

The companies' explanations

Most of the companies chalked up the continued "poor" ratings, in part, to their sheer size. Not only are their products hugely popular, they said, but every year they field millions of calls from customers, many of whom walk away perfectly satisfied.

 

"I think we're the victim of our own success, in the sense that we're growing so rapidly," Rick Germano, the senior vice president of national customer operations for Comcast, said of the telecommunications giant, which ranked second in the MSN Money-Zogby survey. "People are choosing to get Internet and cable and telephone with us, and that's where we're playing catch-up on the customer-service front."

The exception was Sprint Nextel, which took full responsibility for its well-publicized poor record of customer service in recent years.

The cellular phone company led poor-customer-service surveys, including the 2007 MSN Money-Zogby survey, and late last year hired a CEO who vowed to make customer service a priority in an effort to stop customer drain. The company posted a $29.6 billion loss over the past 12 months.

"We've had higher-than-desired churn," spokeswoman Roni Singleton said. "We've had to overcome the hurdles, and that's been a challenge for us."

Sprint Nextel was also the only returning company to improve its score, albeit slightly. The other repeaters received greater percentages of "poor" responses than in 2007. The overall average "poor" rating for the top 10 increased from 27% in 2007 to 35% in 2008.

Hanks, the consultant, said that before the current economic woes took their toll on customer-service opinions, those opinions had been getting better in recent years.

 

When talk turns to recession, companies tend to cut where they think it will hurt the least: in customer service. "Fears of a downturn start to get into the psyches of senior managers in this country," Hanks said.

High-ranking companies

Companies at the other end of the survey, with few marks for poor service, also came as little surprise to experts. In particular, Nordstrom, American Express and Marriott were cited as three that routinely earn high marks.

 

Companies such as these try to weather the tough times by continuing to invest in customer service, Hanks said. In the end, they earn lifelong, loyal customers who tend to cost less and pay more.

By contrast, companies that turn off the charm in search of immediate profits risk long-term success, Hanks said.

It's common for companies criticized for bad customer service to defend themselves by pointing to their legions of satisfied customers or by citing averages, Hanks said. But ignoring the unsatisfied customers catches up with them eventually.

 

And as research has shown, satisfied customers equate to happy shareholders. Conversely, unhappy customers may lead to unhappy shareholders. Just ask Time Warner (the parent company), Comcast and Sprint: Their stocks are down 26%, 18% and 55%, respectively, over the past year, compared with an 8% drop for the S&P 500 Index.

1. AOL's response. Post your experiences here.

2. Comcast's response. Post your experiences here.

3. Sprint Nextel's response. Post your experiences here.

4. Abercrombie & Fitch's response. Post your experiences here.

5. Qwest's response. Post your experiences here.

6. Capital One's response. Post your experiences here.

7. Bank of America's response. Post your experiences here.

8. Time Warner Cable's response. Post your experiences here.

9. HSBC Finance's response. Post your experiences here.

10. Cox Communications' response. Post your experiences here.

Click here to see the full list of companies.

Filed Under
Internet & Media Broadband ISPs -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Because of the Economic

Because of the Economic Crisis that we are experiencing today, people are getting wise about using payday loans instead of credit cards. They are also coming up with some pretty creative ways to save money. Companies are, too. Gannett Inc., which owns several newspapers across the country, decided that rather than lay off even more employees they’d require everyone to take a week of unpaid leave. What a brilliant idea! Everyone gets a vacation AND they get to keep their jobs. Sure, they’ll miss out on a week’s pay, but what’s that compared to losing your job altogether? They can always use payday loans if a financial emergency comes up during the time they miss a paycheck. For more about creative responses to recession and to read some tidbits I found about how people scraped by in tough times, visit your payday loans source.

AOL..............................

Oh i see !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--------------------
Michael

SEO

Conan

I would like to nominate the people behind the online game Conan, for refusing to provive any customer service whatsoever.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <p> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!--break-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.


Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

 

Utility Consumers' Action Network - (619) 696-6966

Terms and Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be: a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the Fraud Squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights ReservedRemember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use New Media Rights' multimedia studio and equipment for free.