Gas prices hit low-income Californians harder
Gas prices pinching Californians' budgets
Poll finds state residents split on who is to blame for the rising cost of fuel
Victoria Colliver
San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, April 17, 2007
About 44 percent of Californians said they've had to cut back on such expenses as food and clothing to afford rising fuel prices, according to a Field Poll to be released today. But responses were sharply divided between higher- and lower-income groups.
The poll found lower-income workers -- those earning less than $40,000 a year -- were twice as likely as those earning more than $80,000 to feel the pinch, with 62 percent reporting reduced spending and 54 percent describing the price rise as "very serious."
Just 30 percent of high-income earners reported changing their spending habits, while 24 percent of that same group described rising gasoline prices as a "very serious" problem.
"The impact is more disproportionate. People at the bottom end of the income spectrum are more likely to have to cut back," said Mark DiCamillo, Field Poll director.
The poll, a random telephone sample of 570 registered voters in the last two weeks of March, comes at a time when gas prices are breaking records in the state.
Californians pay an average of $3.33 per gallon at the pump compared with $2.86 per gallon for regular nationwide, the AAA auto club reported Monday. San Francisco and Oakland both set records, reaching per-gallon rates of $3.45 and $3.35, respectively.
According to the Field Poll, voters cited the oil companies and the Bush administration as those most responsible for the price increases.
Of those surveyed, 65 percent heaped a lot of blame on oil companies while 46 percent directed their ire at the administration. Oil-producing countries got a lot of blame from 37 percent, while 29 percent put the blame on Americans who drive gas-guzzling vehicles. The poll allowed people to choose multiple answers.
Michael Shames, executive director of the San Diego watchdog group Utility Consumers' Action Network, pointed his finger at the state government more than the Bush administration. He said the state has failed to address the problem and pay proper attention to the oil markets.
"What the poll is showing is that the public doesn't realize that the current gas prices are attributable to California policies," Shames said.
Poll directors were surprised by the lack of change in public opinion from a similar poll conducted two years ago.
About 70 percent of California voters surveyed in March and August 2005, when prices passed the $2-per-gallon mark, described gasoline cost increases as "very" or "somewhat" serious.
"It seems as if Californians are somewhat conditioned to the higher (price) of gasoline. So when the $3 (level) occurred, it had the same relative jolt as when it went above $2 two years ago," DiCamillo said.
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network
File a complaint about a company online.
Terms & Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Privacy Policy
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Icerocket









poor tax?
sounds like a tax on low-income consumers...bogus
Post new comment