SDG&E's new solar rate.....not so sunny
UCAN has reviewed the new DR-SES tariff which went into effect on May 1, 2008 and compared it to the existing Net Metering tariff. We have had difficulty finding much merit in the DR-SES relative NEM except, perhaps, for those self-generating customers who have no electric consumption during the peak periods of the summer. And even that isn't quite so clear.
SDG&E's new DR-SES rate appears to do away with the baseline billing resulting in any positive usage being billed at the stated TOU rate of $.07662 fixed rate plus a changeable commodity rate (see below) The customer also pays an additional $3.81 a month. From what we can tell, a customer would have to build up a significant credit during the summer on-peak rate to offset the loss of the baseline allowance. Moreover, the TOU rates for winter would be a significant problem for an all electric homes given the reduced daylight hours and cloudy winter days. The best case for the new tariff would be for customers who work during the day out of their house and do not use a lot of electricity during winter months (e.g. heat their homes and water using gas or solar power. Even then, it isn't so clear that there are notable benefits for such customers.
Late breaking item: In July 2008, SDG&E filed an advice letter asking the CPUC to approve a revision to its DR-SES rate that would allow a customer to try the DR-SES rate for 90 days and, if they aren't satisfied, that customer can revert back to a Net Metering rate. If the CPUC approves, then customers who might possibly benefit from DR-SES might want to try out this option......but we expect there won't be too many customers who will fit into that particular niche.
| Schedule DR-SES | ||||
| Commodity Rate | Fixed Rate |
Total Rate |
Charged/Saved | |
| Summer: | On-Peak | 0.18265 | $.07662 | $.2597 |
| Summer: | Semi-Peak | 0.08649 | $.07662 | $.16311 |
| Summer: | Off-Peak | 0.06788 | $.07662 | $.14450 |
| WInter: | Semi-Peak | 0.07976 | $.07662 | $.15638 |
| Winter | Off-Peak | 0.06987 | $.07662 | $.14649 |
The upshot is that the winter rates are pretty close to the average rate charged to all customers at the lower tiers (avg. $.15 p/kwhr). The summer peak rate is about 70% higher but only during the 11am-6pm time period. Any customer opting to use the DR-SES rate would not want to use ANY electricity during that summer peak period.
The monetary benefits of DR-SES are hard to discern. At this point, UCAN does not recommend this alternative rate unless a customer produces at least 500 kwhrs per month from their PV system, consumes well over 1000 kwhrs each month and uses almost electricity during the summer peak periods. Even then, it is unlikely that a customer would see a significant monetary benefit (or payment) from SDG&E at the annual true-up that would offset the risk of possibly owing SDG&E money.
After the rate went into effect, we asked SDG&E whether it had computed any exemplars of customer consumption patterns where a customer might come out better than using a DR-SES rate rather than under a NEM (net metering) rate. The answer: SDG&E hadn't done it. But they were nice enough to pull something together for us. Here's what SDG&E wrote:
Table 1 presents estimated annual electric bills under Schedules DR and DR-SES for residential customers in two climate regions (Inland and Coastal) and at three levels of average monthly usage (500 kWh, 1,000 kWh, and 2,000 kWh). The usage estimates are prior to PV installation and reduction in net usage. This analysis assumes a solar system with an AC rating of 2kW. Annual bill amounts shown are for the estimated net usage after PV installation.
|
Table 1: SDG&E Estimated Annual Bill Comparison |
| SDG&E |
| ESTIMATED ANNUAL BILL COMPARISON |
| Average | Monthly | Consumption | |
| Inland Zone Customer | 500 kWh | 1,000 kWh | 2,000 kWh |
| Schedule DR ($/Year) |
$277 | $1,293 | $4,067 |
| Schedule DR-SES ($/Year) |
$412 | $1,237 | $2,887 |
| Bill Difference ($/Year) |
$135 | ($56) |
($1,181) |
| Bill Difference (%) |
48.6% | -4.3% | -29.0% |
| Coastal Zone Customer |
|||
| Schedule DR ($/Year) |
$277 | $1,342 | $4,129 |
| Schedule DR-SES ($/Year) |
$417 | $1,247 |
$2,907 |
| Bill Difference ($/Year) |
$140 | ($95) |
($1,222) |
| Bill Difference (%) |
50.6% | -7.1% | -29.6% |
Notes:
1. Calculations based on rates effective June 1, 2008.
2. Schedule DR-SES bill calculation uses average customer load profile, by climate zone, based on SDG&E load research sample. The annual average load shape used to represent Coastal customers has 11% of consumption in the on-peak period, 31% in the semi-peak, and 58% in the off-peak. The annual average load shape used to represent Inland customers has 12% of consumption in the on-peak period, 31% in the semi-peak, and 57% in the off-peak.[1]
3. Actual load shape and bill amount under Schedule DR-SES will vary by customer.
As shown in Table 1 above, residential solar customers at 500 kWh of average monthly consumption who install a 2kW PV system benefit greatly from the AB1X capped rates under Schedule DR. By remaining on Schedule DR the customer's net consumption will be within Baseline allowances and therefore billed under highly subsidized rates still capped based on 2001 levels. If the low-usage customer were to instead opt for Schedule DR-SES the customer would be subject to an annual bill increase of approximately $135 as compared to Schedule DR.
At higher levels of consumption, under Schedule DR, net consumption enters into the higher-priced upper tiers where the rates are increased to recover subsidies related to AB1X capped rates. As usage levels increase, the benefits associated with TOU rates for solar production increase as well.
At the 1,000 kWh average monthly consumption level, net consumption under Schedule DR enters into Tiers 3 and 4 for both Inland and Coastal customers, and can result in savings under Schedule DR-SES. For example, as shown on Table 1, an Inland zone customer using 1,000 kWh that opts for Schedule DR-SES would benefit from an annual bill decrease of approximately $56, or 4% as compared to Schedule DR.
At the 2,000 kWh average monthly consumption level, net consumption would be predominantly priced at the highest-priced usage tier under Schedule DR. Switching to Schedule DR-SES will result in significant bill decreases for both Inland and Coastal customers. For example, as shown on Table 1, if an Inland zone customer using 2,000 kWh opts for Schedule DR-SES the customer would benefit from an annual bill decrease of approximately $1,181, or 29% as compared to Schedule DR.
OUR CONCLUSION: This is pretty complex stuff. UCAN's advice is that if you are using a LOT of kwhrs and you inexplicably installed a relatively undersized 2kW system, you might be interested in looking at the DR-SES rate. But it is the rare residential customer who has installed a such a small PV system when their consumption is so high (primarly, it'd be someone who just wanted to get out of the top tier rates). Given this analysis, it is hard to think of many SDG&E customers who'd want to take advantage of this rate.
[1] The Time-Of-Use periods under Schedule DR-SES are:
· Summer (May through October):
o On-Peak: 11 a.m. - 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding Holidays.
o Semi-Peak: 6 a.m. - 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. - 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding Holidays.
o Off-Peak: 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. Monday through Friday and all hours weekends and Holidays.
· Winter (November through April):
o Semi-Peak: 6 a.m. - 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding Holidays.
o Off-Peak: 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. Monday through Friday and all hours weekends and Holidays.
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network - (619) 696-6966
Terms and Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be: a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the Fraud Squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved. Remember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use New Media Rights' multimedia studio and equipment for free.








Baseline / Changes / DR SES /Electric Usage Consultant
I have a baseline rate of 333 KwH. I added on so that my kids and my disabled sister could move back with me and I now have 8 people in my house. My current usage averages about 2,400. Last month it was 2695 KwH and my bill was $916.58. If my sister and my kids lived in their own apartment they each would have a baseline rate of their own of 333 KwH. Is there a way to increase my baseline rate. This is so unfair that I am paying 22.87 cents a KwH when most people are paying 40% lower rates than I am.
Is there anyway that SDG&E would up my baseline rate because I have 8 people in my house. the baseline is suppose to represent 50 to 60 percent of normal usage. As you can see my baseline of 333 represents about 12% of my total usage last month. Can I at least get two meters so I can get two baseline rates.
Last month I averaged 20.29 cents a KwH. It seems that a DR SES rate may be useful.
Is there a service or a consultant that can provides an analysis? Does SDG & E provide an analysis?
education
very appreciating informative
education
good blog
The biggest one is now the
The biggest one is now the power line that threatens our back country for so called solar energy in the desert that is not even a reality.
Solar Rate
I had a TOU meter installed in July based on UCAN's support of the new meters. SDGE was not able to even tell me how to read the meter! There is no way to actually tell what your usage is during the month. The bill that they send is so misleading that I am not sure if I'm being billed correctly or not. SDGE sends a spreadsheet along with the regular bill that attempts to explain the billing but it is not really very clear and takes a calculator to figure out the credits and debits. At this point I have no idea whether or not I will save any money.
SDGE reverse engineered rates
This DR SES rate so called solar energy system rate is just another example of how SDGE is manipulating the public and discouraging solar for San Diego locals. It is obviously reverse engineered and makes no sense for anyone other than SDGE.
This was the long awaited rate that had many hopeful there was going to finally be a time of use rate in the SDGE area that pays customers a fair value for the peak energy that their solar systems provide to the grid. SDGE does not want to encourage peak energy generation from solar systems, they want to make peak power with natural gas over the border in Mexico and avoid EPA regulations.
I don't think anyone is surprised by this as Sempa has been manipulating San Diego for years now dating back to the fake energy crisis they helped create. The biggest one is now the power line that threatens our back country for so called solar energy in the desert that is not even a reality. The sterling engine system is has not even been used and has lost funding sources say because they bid it too cheap, can't deliver and it is not a tried and true product. With confirmation now that the fires were caused by power lines and the facts that Sempra just wants to build a gas plant in Mexico and sell the energy to LA while destroying our inland areas should be enough for San Diego to finally stand up against Sempra, one would hope...Dirk
Post new comment