Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

UCAN will go to court if Sunrise Powerlink project is approved

UCAN In the Media

Calif. regulators to vote on San Diego power line

Thursday, December 18, 2008

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. says it must build a $1.9 billion, 123-mile transmission line to harness solar, wind and underground heat from a distant desert.

Critics question if the high-voltage power line will ever deliver on its promise of providing renewable power from California's Imperial Valley to the nation's eighth-largest city. They say it will blight the mountain landscape with 150-foot towers and emphasize that ratepayers will pick up the tab.

Those views will clash Thursday when the California Public Utilities Commission meets in San Francisco to consider approving the power line. The PUC has held marathon public hearings since SDG&E asked permission to build the Sunrise Powerlink three years ago and it commissioned an 11,000-page report on its potential impact on the environment.

PUC President Michael Peevey, backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, proposes that the five-member panel approve SDG&E's 500-kilovolt line, which would carry enough electricity for about 750,000 homes, or about half of the utility's customers.

Commissioner Dian Grueneich wants to condition approval on requirements to ensure the line is used for renewable energy. A PUC administrative law judge recommended commissioners reject the proposal.

SDG&E, a unit of San Diego-based Sempra Energy, dropped initial plans to cut 23 miles through the middle of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, a spot known for its hiking trails, wildflowers, palm groves, cacti and spectacular mountain views.

Thursday's vote comes as utilities nationwide are under pressure to rely less on coal and natural gas to fire their plants, the biggest source of carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S.

California's three investor-owned utilities are required to get 20 percent of power from renewables by the end of 2010. SDG&E is the biggest laggard, getting just 6 percent from renewables.

SDG&E would build the power line but buy the juice from a host of generating companies. The most ambitious generation project relies on a commercially untested technology for a gigantic solar plant.

Stirling Energy Systems Inc., a Phoenix startup, wants to build thousands of solar dishes, each four stories tall about 100 miles east of San Diego. The dishes, which collect sunlight to heat gas and drive the cylinders of an engine, have been tested on a small scale but would now need to move to mass production.

The PUC's vote is unlikely to be the final word.

If the line is rejected, SDG&E can ask the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to overrule the decision. A 2005 law gives the federal government authority to approve power lines in Southern California and other parts of the country deemed to need more transmission capacity.

A power line opponent, Michael Shames of Utility Consumers' Action Network, said the consumer advocacy group would ask a state court to block construction.

<!--/.articleheadings --><!-- types/article/articletools.tmpl -->

Filed Under

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <p> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!--break-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options




Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved