Report from the Sunrise Transmission Project Hearings (day 7)
UCAN News
Three witnesses were cross-examined today. The morning started with the Mussey Grade Alliance cross examination of SDG&E fire-expert Mortier. Most of his testimony was struck as being non-responsive to the direct testimony of Mussey Grade. He confirmed the assertions by Mussey Grade that the construction of Sunrise would increase the chance of backcountry fires -- include disasterous ones such as the Cedar fire.
He was followed by a high priced ($95 an hour) consultant hired by SDG&E to convince the PUC that Sunrise was essential for spurring renewable energy development in the Imperial Valley. Even before he'd gotten on the stand, his testimony had been undermined by prior SDG&E witnesses who had admitted that most of the renewable power available to SDG&E was wind power located in East San Diego County and Mexico as well as San Diego County bio-mass. No geothermal at all is in the offing any time soon. He admitted that he didn't do any studies to support his conclusions. And he didn't know that SDG&E had already established that there was over 2400MW of export capacity that would be available to transfer renewable power out of the Valley, even if Sunrise were not built.
Finally, SDG&E put a witness on the stand to discuss renewable contracts that SDG&E had entered into or was negotiating. He added to the hearing intrigue by confirming the testimony of Yari that SDG&E is considering a substation at or near Jacumba to bring in wind from East San Diego County. Such a substation may well serve as an alternate to Sunrise and could be the anchor of a southern route that bypasses the Anza-Borrego desert. With each day, it seems as though the viability of Sunrise diminishes and UCAN's alternatives -- like a line parallel to SWPL or other transmission upgrades to the north -- could become the focal point of the Commission's deliberations.
At the end of the day, SDG&E's economics witness took the stand. Jan Strack will be on the stand for the next day or two, as the economic feasibility of SWPL hinges on his cross-examination. Stay tuned.
-Michael
Listen to Michael Shames discuss UCAN's opposition to Sunrise.
Watch cross-examination from the Sunrise Hearings.
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network
(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.
Terms & Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved
Post new comment