Solar Panel Permitting Fee White Paper
Executive Summary
While the state spends hundreds of millions of dollars promoting renewable energy and conservation, a number of local cities in San Diego County are impeding customers' efforts to switch to non-polluting, renewable energy. That is the startling findings of UCAN's survey of the building and permitting departments in San Diego County.
This study highlights the urgent need to standardize most cities' solar installation permitting process and provides ways of accomplishing that goal. In general, UCAN recommends a collaboration of city and state officials, licensing boards, solar component manufacturers, contractors and installers to create a standardized model for the permitting process and pricing. In this way, San Diego Cities can assist the region in becoming energy efficient and energy self-sufficient.
UCAN's review of the policies of 17 cities throughout San Diego and the County of San Diego shows a wide discrepancy in the cost of permitting fees and requirements to install photovoltaic (PV) solar panel systems. Permit fees varied from a minimal $22.50 to over $500, with an additional $1,000 Design Review application fee in Del Mar--more than a twenty-fold difference. The variation in type of permits and charges required to install solar panel systems ranged from city to city. Four cities assessed an issuance charge; 12 required plot plans, four required roof & structural plans or a building permit, and six cities had no set requirements for permitting. In fact, no two permitting departments were alike in terms of procedure, costs or required information for installing PV systems.
More San Diego residents are turning to solar energy in light of the state's energy crisis. UCAN's survey reveals that though some permitting agencies have streamlined the process and are prepared to handle the new technology, many lag behind and consumers and contractors are the ones that suffer. Some building and planning departments are currently ill-prepared to handle the task of permitting PV installations because they lack the standards and experience of more seasoned departments. Numerous city building departments previously dealt with a handful of solar permits a year, but as PV becomes more of a solution for California's energy future, the cities will need to revamp their currently-outdated systems.
UCAN's Specific Findings of the Cities Surveyed
Costs, Exorbitant Fees and Extraneous Requirements
· On average, permitting fees cost $218.
· Four cities had permit fees under $70
· Six cities had permit fees over $200
· Costs of permits can vary by 2300% depending on the city in which the solar panel system is located
· Consumers face excessive charges for permit fees and additional requirements compared to neighboring cities
· Plan check fees range from no-fee in El Centro and with the County of San Diego to as much as $400 in Chula Vista.
· Consumers may be charged higher fees for the same service such as building permit fees and plot plans.
Lack of Standardization
· Various cities have no standard for determining permit fees: 1 city used a design review process, 1 used a performance-based inspection, 8 cities used a contract valuation, and 8 cities had a flat fee.
· The type of documentation needed for a solar permit is not standardized and varies from city to city.
· Consumers and contractors may endure long delays caused by requirements for both a solar and building inspection or due to not having foreknowledge of required documents.
· There are a limited number of qualified solar permitting inspectors.
I. Introduction
According to the most recent report from the California Energy Commission, the State of California imports 18% of its power needs. The San Diego region produces approximately 2,200 MW of power to serve the area's projected 2001 demand of 4,376 MW. In other words, customers in SDG&E's service territory are heavily-dependent on importing half of their electricity from outside the region. One way to decrease this dependence is for residents and businesses to invest in on-site, distributed generation such as fuel cells, microturbines, wind generation, co-generation, passive solar water heating and solar energy. Electricity generated in this manner does not need to be transported over long distances from centralized, large power
plants to the end user, distributed generation technologies could reduce the estimated 6% to 8.6% of electricity that is lost by transporting it through the transmission and distribution system; thus, aiding in reducing the region's import dependence by upwards of 187 MW. In truth, transmission line upgrades are not only inherently inefficient with line loss factors, but reinforce our dependence on importing power from out-of-state, while increasing the rates of utility consumers to pay for their construction.
A Typical Case History:
Lewis Fry is a consumer who lives in Chula Vista who decided to invest in a solar panel system that would meet his family's energy needs, allow them to do their part in resolving the energy crisis and produce their own power using a renewable, non-polluting energy source - the sun. He did extensive research and finally chose a contractor and equipment that would power his house and reduce his family's reliance upon imported power. But he was blindsided by a disturbing realization - his local municipality was going to make him pay dearly for his good intentions. It was with more than just a little shock that he learned in early June that he would have to pay upwards of $607 to obtain a permit for his new 2.4 kW solar electric system. The City of Chula Vista required $200 for the building permit and $400 to review the plans for the installation. In addition, the City told Mr. Fry's contractor, a licensed electrician for almost ten years, that it would require 7 to 21 days to review the those plans. To date, Mr. Fry is still waiting for his system's permit to be approved by the City of Chula Vista. Until the permit is issued, Mr. Fry will not be able to receive his 50% rebate from the California Energy Commission for installing renewable energy.
Unfortunately, Mr. Fry is not alone. Other consumers throughout San Diego are finding that a municipality can be a friend or an obstacle to "doing the right thing" for the environment and for Southern California's dependence on importing electricity. UCAN decided to compare the various costs and issues associated with installing solar electric panel systems in the cities and County of San Diego. We found that some cities used a sliding scale for permitting fees and therefore we assumed an average PV system of 3kW, enough to provide approximately 450 kWh per month costing approximately $16,000 after deducting the California Energy Commission's Buydown rebate.
II. Solar Permits
According to data from San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), the local utility that oversees the interconnection of solar electric panels to its transmission and distribution grid, 2001 has already shown a seven-fold increase in the number of PV systems installed compared to the previous year, with hundreds of other installations in the works. Statewide, the California Energy Commission, which doles out the state's 50% rebate program for installing solar energy and other forms of distributed generation, shows a ten-fold increase in solar energy rebate requests in 2001 compared to 2000. Obviously, the current electricity climate in California and Southern California has led to a substantial increase in the number of consumers who have decided to invest in generating their own power using solar energy. However, though it is evident that solar power is exponentially on the rise, the question remains about whether the agencies in charge of making sure such systems are installed safely, have the resources and expertise to permit these installations in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Using solar energy to create electricity necessitates review by various planning agencies. Solar permits are required to insure that new solar electrical systems are safe for homeowners, contractors, electricity grid technicians, firemen and the transmission and distribution grid that serves the community. Connecting any kind of electrical generation into the transmission grid is potentially dangerous and must be done with caution. Therefore, appropriate interconnection standards are required to prevent electrocution and electrical fires, ensure that solar electric panels and the community are safe from power surges during blackouts, and facilitate the safe backflow of power into the transmission and distribution grid. In addition, building structures must be inspected for wind sheer and load bearing capabilities before solar electric systems may be installed. In general, permits need to be issued to ensure that solar systems meet current building and electrical code requirements.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Solar Energy Permitting Fees whitepaper.doc | 103 KB |
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network - (619) 696-6966
Terms and Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be: a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the Fraud Squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved. Remember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use New Media Rights' multimedia studio and equipment for free.








Solar Permit Fee study for commercial projects in California
News Release
Sierra Club
Loma Prieta Chapter
3921 East Bayshore Road, Suite 204
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Contact:Kurt Newick (phone: 408-370-9636)
Email: SolarPermitFees@gmail.com
Oct. 12. 2010
High Permit Fees Hinder Large Commercial Solar Power,
One Third of Cities Over-Charge, Others Promote Solar
The Sierra Club (Loma Prieta Chapter) has initiated a campaign to encourage municipalities in Silicon Valley to support the installation of large-scale solar power systems on non-residential structures by lowering permit fees. In October 2010, the Sierra Club formally asked municipalities with unreasonably high commercial solar permit fees to consider lowering them to cost-recovery levels.
From 2008 to 2010, Sierra Club volunteers surveyed all the municipalities in Alameda, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties to determine their estimated permit fees for installing roof-mounted photovoltaic (PV) systems on commercial buildings. Such structures can include office buildings, stores, industrial facilities, schools, churches, government and non-profit buildings. Volunteers conducted this survey for three system sizes (8 kW, 49 kW and 131 kW). A ground breaking companion report has just been published for the Sierra Club’s Commercial PV permit fee campaign. It may be the first in-depth fee study published in the U.S.A. for commercial PV projects.
Some of the surveyed cities had little or no experience permitting large PV systems and provided tentative responses. Others, such as Cupertino, have formally adopted PV permit fee schedules and provided confident survey answers. Many jurisdictions have adjusted their fees as a result of the Sierra Club's solar permit fee campaign, which began for residential PV systems in 2005. This new report shows survey responses and PV permit fee trends from 2008 - 2010.
The survey shows that for commercial PV projects 131 kW in size, 37% (19) of the jurisdictions are over-charging fees, exceeding maximum cost recovery threshold levels as determined by an innovative PV permit fee calculator highlighted is this new report. Kurt Newick, leader of the study states, “This survey reveals many municipalities are complementing federal and state governments by incentivizing solar power with very reasonable permit fees, while other cities are doing just the opposite, charging many times more than what is needed to recover costs.” For the large 131 kW system size in this fee study, over a quarter (14) of the jurisdictions have significantly reduced their fees (by an average of 81%) from Spring of 2008 to Summer of 2010, whereas 3 of the cities (Hayward, Newark and San Mateo) have significantly increased fees (by an average of over 800%) during this period.
On October 4, 2010, the survey team contacted 12 municipalities that have fees exceeding $5,000 for the 131 kW system size. The team did this to notify these cities that their solar permit fees where unreasonably high and request that they review their solar permit fee calculation methods, since they are likely charging fees higher than cost-recovery levels. Charging more for solar permits than the reasonable costs to administer them violates California Government Code Section 66014, which provides that fees associated with building inspections and building permits "shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged."
Since local sunlight and available roof space are plentiful, only the number of solar power installations limits the production potential of this abundant renewable resource. This news release and solar permit fee campaign acknowledges leaders of those cities that have already taken action to make solar energy more affordable, particularly for businesses and non-profit entities, and ask others to follow their lead.
The attached chart shows PV permit fees for commercial buildings for jurisdictions in the surveyed region.
Sierra Club Commercial PV Permit Fee Campaign: http://www.SolarPermitFees.org/commercial.html
Sierra Club Commercial PV Permit Fee Report: www.SolarPermitFees.org/PVFeeStudyCommercial.pdf
Executive Summary of Commercial PV Permit Fee Report , 10/5/2010, by Sierra Club, Loma Prieta Chapter
A mid-2010 survey by the Sierra Club revealed wide variation in permit fees charged for commercial rooftop photovoltaic (PV) energy systems by municipalities in three counties in the San Francisco Bay Area. The survey found that fees for commercial PV projects of 131 kW in size varied from $0 to over $13,000. High fees can discourage businesses from making good, long-term, high-yield investments in solar power. 37% of the surveyed municipalities are charging fees that exceed the maximum cost-recovery levels identified in this report.
The time needed for city staff to review and inspect a commercial PV project does not vary linearly by system size. For instance, interviews conducted in the preparation of this report revealed that the difference in time needed to process a 100 kW PV project is about twice as long as a 10 kW project (not ten times as long). Basing fees on the value of the solar equipment inflates permit costs to unreasonably high levels, especially for larger, more expensive solar power projects To recover costs, therefore, permit fees should be based on specific review times and billable hourly rates and not on PV project valuations.
The authors of this study have developed a free, public fee calculator spreadsheet to help municipalities determine cost recovery: www.SolarPermitFees.org/PVFeeCalcCommercial.xls.
This report recommends best practices that municipalities can adopt to assure greater consistency, and help businesses develop an energy source that leads to a healthier, safer, and more stable community. These include setting permit fees at cost-recovery levels, and instituting streamlined permit processing procedures.
# # #
Links:
Sierra Club, Loma Prieta Chapter PV permit fee campaign web site: www.SolarPermitFees.org.
Commercial PV Permit Fee Campaign web site: www.SolarPermitFees.org/commercial.html
Commercial PV Permit Fee Report (Oct. 2010): www.SolarPermitFees.org/PVFeeStudyCommercial.pdf
Commercial PV Permit Summary of Recommendations: www.SolarPermitFees.org/PVPermitRecommendCommercial.pdf
Residential PV Permit Fee Report 2008 (Northern California): www.SolarPermitFees.org/NorCalPVFeeReport.pdf
Residential PV Permit Fee Report 2009 (Southern California): www.SolarPermitFees.org/SoCalPVFeeReport.pdf
I just had a solar system
I just had a solar system installed on my mom's home in chula
vista and the permit process went by quick the system is up and running now.
Post new comment