
SDG&E trying to maintain region's power
UCAN Editor's Note: UCAN will be asking CPUC, the California Public Utilities Commission to reopen the Sunrise Powerlink Transmission project. If the Sunrise power line was built, it would have been located in the middle of the worst parts of the current firestorm. It's just one more reason why the Sunrise Transmission Project must be terminated.
Thousands of customers lost service yesterday
October 23, 2007
As an army of firefighters scrambled to battle the region's massive wildfires, San Diego Gas & Electric fought to keep power flowing to nervous customers still in their homes.
The utility said yesterday afternoon that about 30,000 customers remained without power, and it had no estimate on when electrical and natural gas service would be restored.
Numerous problems were to blame for the outages, spokeswoman Christy Heiser said, including power poles destroyed by the fires, blown transformers and burned distribution lines. The fires are preventing much of the needed repair work.
The utility also has lost the use of a major transmission line into the region, the Southwest Power Link, which has been shut down since midday Sunday. The line, which carries about 1,750 megawatts, runs roughly parallel to Interstate 8 and brings electricity to the region from Mexico and Arizona.
Regional demand for power was moderate yesterday, peaking at about 3,500 megawatts, which allowed the utility to meet regional needs despite the loss of the transmission line. SDG&E had record demand of about 4,600 megawatts during a heat wave this year.
To meet yesterday's demand, the utility deployed all local electricity-generation resources and tapped power from the north. When the north-south transmission lines were shut down because of the fires, the utility had to cut power briefly to about 70,000 customers. The north-south link was repaired within about 30 minutes.
In order to restore power to all customers, SDG&E is sending out all available crews and has asked for assistance from other Western utility companies, Heiser said.
The utility is still asking customers to conserve electricity by avoiding the use of major appliances until evening hours and shutting down air conditioners, unless the health of a resident is dependent on the filtration of pollutants that some cooling systems provide.
Critics of SDG&E's plan to build the Sunrise Powerlink said yesterday's fires underscored their long-held concern about the fire hazard the proposed transmission line would bring to the backcountry.
Fire officials have said an electric-system failure appears to have started the Witch Creek fire, though a final determination will require further investigation.
“The Sunrise Powerlink would just be another ignition source,” said David Hogan of the Center for Biological Diversity, which opposes the Sunrise project.
Hogan and other critics also said the section of Sunrise from Ramona to the west would likely have been shut down by the fires, keeping the line from delivering power to large population centers.
SDG&E has said the line would ensure electricity reliability in the region, particularly if the Southwest Power Link had to be shut down.
But yesterday's events showed that fires can simultaneously shut down both power lines, said Michael Shames, executive director of the Utility Consumers' Action Network.
Heiser of SDG&E said eastern sections of the Sunrise Powerlink – planned to originate in Imperial County and run across North County – would not have been affected by the fires. State grid officials also said yesterday that larger power lines such as the proposed Sunrise project are less likely to cause fires than smaller local-distribution lines.
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network
(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.
Terms & Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved









They really should go and
They really should go and re-investigate the case. It's not fare to do this to them !
Witch Creek fire sparked by SDG&E powerline explosion?
The Los Angeles Times has an article out that suggests the Witch Creek fire may have been caused by an exploding SDG&E powerline:
"Reassured, Dena and her husband, Roger, went to bed around midnight. But around 1:30 a.m., Roger, who had been having trouble sleeping, got up to go to the bathroom. He looked out the window and saw what appeared to be some kind of electrical explosion in the valley below.
"You could see this red-hot power line pulsing and throwing sparks in the riverbed down there," Dena recalled."
Fires jeopardize transmission lines
With this firestorm of 2007, am I the only one to notice that the major powerline south of I-8 from the Imperial valley traversed the Harris fire, and the Sunrise Powerlink traversed the Witch fire?
Can you say Local Generation, especially solar, etc.!!!
I am sure SDG&E would argue that the probably of both lines going down at the same time is Infinitesimal. Who would have Thunk....
Bill E.
UCAN will be asking SDG&E the same questions
Hi Bill - Thanks for writing. You can rest assured that you aren't the only person that noticed that. The Commission has been put on notice and UCAN will be asking for a reopening of the case to address the fact that SDG&E's proposed transmission route was the location of the biggest and most damaging of all of the fires. If built, it would have been out of commission, even through this week. That's why UCAN made its showing of how local generation was a more secure source of power in our May 2007 testimony. We're definitely on this one.
Michael Shames
Post new comment