Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!
Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amount. Click here to visit our secure donation page.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Propeller
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Newsvine
Furl
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Icerocket









I have scanned the smart
I have scanned the smart grid study, and I don't believe that UCAN should have jumped on this bandwagon.
A large amount of the assumption is based on all the people allowing to give up their control of their applicences and/or daily lives. Or be willing to pay a large amount of money for these things to operate.
Before the electrical system was "DEREGULATED", WE HAD SERVICE. Now we are asked to compromise to maintain something that ran pretty smooth before.
I remember the Berkley economists saying how we started on a road to cheeper utility rates (they are very silent now), and all I see so far is how to try to conserve to patch the mess that we got ourselves into. The utility before had to make sure that sustem was ran correctly and added accordingly. I rarely saw a time I had to conserve or be punished for useing electrical items by having to pay for useing over an alloted amount of electricity.
I am sad to see this new rule come to be and I want to know what will be done if it turns out to be too expensive for the average person to pay for.
Who played the tape through to the end? What happens if it turns to be even more of a hardship, how far would we have to go?
Post new comment