Share

From this page you can share Ethiopian AT&T Wireless Roaming Overcharges and Cramming to a social bookmarking site or email a link to the page.
Social WebE-mail
Message to Send
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
http://www.ucan.org/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/ethiopian_at_t_wireless_roaming_overcharges_and_cramming
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from UCAN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the UCAN web site.

Ethiopian AT&T Wireless Roaming Overcharges and Cramming

This complaint addresses the standard practice of AT&T imposing unauthorized international roaming charges on customers who had not affirmatively enabled the service nor received adequate notice that AT&T was enabling the service without their permission. This practice is commonly known as cramming, and prohibited under Pub. Util. Code § 2890(a), which states that "A telephone bill may only contain charges for products or services, the purchase of which the subscriber has authorized."

This complaint also asserts AT&T, in connection with one or more of its international affiliates, is engaging in a dubious practice of charging customers for calls never placed while traveling abroad. This practice also falls under the definition of cramming and as such is prohibited under Pub. Util. Code §2890(a).

UCAN asserts that these customers never sought nor authorized international roaming as a service provided in connection with their cellular phone service.

In addition, regardless of whether customers did or did not authorize international roaming, they are being charged international roaming rates for calls that were never placed. Thus any charges incurred as a result of international roaming were through the result of an unapproved and/or unused service from which the customer received no benefit.

AT&T's practice of enabling international roaming service without adequate customer notification and billing customers for unplaced calls while in a foreign country violates the provisions of California's Public Utilities Code, which is intended to protect consumers from "cramming" of unauthorized charges. This practice also undermines the public policy underlying ensuring California customers have control over charges incurred in their phone service.

AT&T has also, at least in one instance, violated cramming laws and regulations, particularly CPUC General Order 168, by refusing to cease collections actions while conducting an investigation into a charge disputed by its customer.




Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!


Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved