Published on UCAN (http://www.ucan.org/drupal)
Ethiopian AT&T Wireless Roaming Overcharges and Cramming

This complaint addresses the standard practice of AT&T imposing unauthorized international roaming charges on customers who had not affirmatively enabled the service nor received adequate notice that AT&T was enabling the service without their permission. This practice is commonly known as cramming, and prohibited under Pub. Util. Code § 2890(a), which states that "A telephone bill may only contain charges for products or services, the purchase of which the subscriber has authorized."

This complaint also asserts AT&T, in connection with one or more of its international affiliates, is engaging in a dubious practice of charging customers for calls never placed while traveling abroad. This practice also falls under the definition of cramming and as such is prohibited under Pub. Util. Code §2890(a).

UCAN asserts that these customers never sought nor authorized international roaming as a service provided in connection with their cellular phone service.

In addition, regardless of whether customers did or did not authorize international roaming, they are being charged international roaming rates for calls that were never placed. Thus any charges incurred as a result of international roaming were through the result of an unapproved and/or unused service from which the customer received no benefit.

AT&T's practice of enabling international roaming service without adequate customer notification and billing customers for unplaced calls while in a foreign country violates the provisions of California's Public Utilities Code, which is intended to protect consumers from "cramming" of unauthorized charges. This practice also undermines the public policy underlying ensuring California customers have control over charges incurred in their phone service.

AT&T has also, at least in one instance, violated cramming laws and regulations, particularly CPUC General Order 168, by refusing to cease collections actions while conducting an investigation into a charge disputed by its customer.

  • UCAN complaint against AT&T Wireless regarding Ethiopian roaming overcharges and cramming [1]
‹ UCAN releases comments on phone billing fraud (cramming) in California [2]up [3]UCAN complaint against AT&T Wireless regarding Ethiopian roaming overcharges and cramming › [4]

Source URL (retrieved on 09/06/2008 - 18:39): http://www.ucan.org/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/ethiopian_at_t_wireless_roaming_overcharges_and_cramming

Links:
[1] http://www.ucan.org/drupal/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/ucan_complaint_against_at_t_wireless_regarding_ethiopian_roaming_overcharges_and_cramming
[2] http://www.ucan.org/drupal/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/ucan_releases_comments_proposed_cramming_reporting_requirements_california
[3] http://www.ucan.org/drupal/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/cramming_reporting_reqs_legal_filings
[4] http://www.ucan.org/drupal/drupal/telecommunications/wireless/ucan_complaint_against_at_t_wireless_regarding_ethiopian_roaming_overcharges_and_cramming