Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

Telecommunications

FCC will probe exclusive handset deals

Want a new iPhone? You can only go through AT&T. If you instead want a new Palm Pre, you can only go through Sprint. You can choose the handset you want, but you sacrifice your freedom to choose the wireless carrier. If you want a specific carrier, you then are limited to the handsets they provide.

This past week, the FCC acknowledged that they will investigate exclusivity arrangements between the wireless carriers and the cell phone manufacturers. These was in response to a written request by four senators (John Kerry of Massachusetts, Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Roger Wicker of Mississippi). Consumers have complained that exclusivity decreases competition and only benefits the carriers and manufacturers. When a wireless carrier is the sole vendor of a specific handset, it can set its own prices and services.

This exclusivity increases its customer base and people switch carriers to purchase the newest gadgets. The exclusivity also benefits the manufacturers. It prevents their products from flooding the market and becoming too common, thereby decreasing their value. Both carriers and manufacturers benefit and there is no incentive for them to change.Consumers argue that the exclusivity leaves markets without choices. People are limited to what phone their carrier provides.

In rural areas, the choice of carrier is limited. Some areas have poor service for certain carriers, or there is an increased risk of roaming. Many people are also reluctant to switch because they've enjoyed their service with a specified carrier or do not want to pay early termination fees. Consumers also argue that this exclusivity puts limitations on new technology. For example, the new iPhone allows for multimedia messaging and tethering. Multimedia messaging allows people to send pictures or videos as they would a text message. Tethering allows your computer to connect to the internet using your cell phone, giving you internet access wherever your cell phone gets service. However, at the time of the release of the new iPhone, AT&T did not allow these features to be used by its customers. These features will be enabled but not until the end of summer. With exclusivity, then, a company can set their own prices and service, without giving the attention to the consumer that comes with real competition.The FCC is meeting this week to discuss the issue.

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless -

San Diego Off-Air TV Viewers Need To Rescan Again: Musical Channels is Finally Over

As mentioned in a previous post, now that musical channels is over and everyone is on the air on their final (many have been reassigned) TV channel, if you still watch TV from an antenna (off the air) and not via cable, U-verse, or satellite, your TV or box needs to relearn the TV landscape.

Here in San Diego, KUSI-TV has made a minor-yet-significant change subsequent to last weekend's historic reshuffling. This is because they were digitally identifying themselves as being on Channel 18 which is, in fact, the "channel chair" they sat down in when the music stopped. But the text you see on your TV when you change channels is not necessarily the actual FCC-assigned channel number. It's called a PSIP and is a simple a tag that each station sends on its data stream showing its virtual channel. It could say "Eat at Joes" but that would be messy, and incorrect. But it does say the call letters and can say either their actual channel or, perhaps, their former channel, because that's how people have known them over the years.

The Man steps in
KUSI elected to say KUSI-18 because  1) it's a fact and  2) a Low-Power Spanish-language station now occupies Channel 51. But the FCC says that, without a waiver, stations need to identify themselves by their former, analog, channel number. Are you losing track yet? Good. Shows you're thinking. Anyway, this rule means KUSI must sent KUSI-51 as its PSIP code. So, if you watch off-air TV, you should rescan to get this new change that was effective today.

RESCANNING May Be Trickier Than You Think
Some DTV sets and converter boxes get confused during a rescan and do not dump their old memories before adding new channels, sometimes causing memory conflicts. One solution is to manually delete all the channels and then execute a rescan.  The other is to follow the FCC's newly-announced procedure called "double rescan."  Steps 1-3 are apparently designed to dump the old memory. If you think this is confusing, you're right, and you shouldn't have to do it again for a LONG LONG TIME.  [Thanks to respected industry newsletter, The CGC Communicator]

Filed Under
Communications: Communications Technology -

Consumer credited over $2000 on International data roaming charges on Verizon Wireless bill

June 17, 2009-- UCAN saved a Verizon Wireless customer almost $3,000. The man travels regularly and has a high-tech phone. He had the nationwide roaming plan for $20 per month and called the company to ask what was available if he wanted to use his phone as a modem in Puerta Vallarta, Mexico. He was advised to purchase the global access card plan for $15 per month. The coverage map on the company website and the CS Rep were both indicators it should have worked. After adding the recommended "Global Data Plan", bills increased to nearly $3,000 for his days in Puerta Vallarta. No one ever mentioned that international roaming charges would not be covered by the plan. UCAN's company executive contact credited the entire amount, explained what the problem was, and further promised credits on taxes, fees and surcharges for this giant charge on the next billing statement.

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless -

Phones and Zones: How AT&T bills you for calls not considered long distance

You know the old joke about local calling zones and LATAs.  There are these two Polish guys in an Irish bar drinking Jamaican rum when....hold on a second, actually, NO one in their right mind or even sloppy drunk, who would talk about zones and LATAs.   The topic might drive you to drink, but even then, you won't want to talk about it.  And that's too bad, because they can be an important part of cutting your "phone phat" and getting your overweight phone bill fighting-trim again.   So let's travel down to the phone phat farm and see how we can cut some of your excess phone weight.

Zones and LATAs
So here's a quick primer.  Back in the "old" days, like a few years ago, most business phone charges were based on distance. This was not narrowed down quite so much for residential calls because you generally get an unlimited number of local calls (unless you opt for ZUM billing) but it's good to know where LOCAL stops.

There are 3 "bands" around your local central office.  Zones 1 and 2 are billed together. You pay a flat rate per-minute rate for these calls. Zone 3 is for calls to central offices from 13 miles to 16 miles and are an additional fee per minute. Beyond that, within your LATA, is called Local Toll. You can have your dialtone provider carry these (at a fairly high rate) or you can have a long distance carrier handle them. The bottom of this web page gives a graphic representation.

What's a LATA? It is a Local Access Transport Area which is the geographic limit of where a wireline phone company (e.g. AT&T in California) can carry calls. They were created as part of the breakup of the phone system in the 1980's. You can call within a LATA without the call being considered an IntraState or InterState (aka Long Distance) call. Here in California, the PUC considers San Diego and Imperial Counties to be LATA 6 and nationally it's called LATA 732.

Long Distance Calls
Calls outside your LATA cannot be handled by your local landline carrier. They must be handled by a long distance provider. You get to choose this carrier (known as a PIC in telco lingo) when you sign up for wireline phone service. Don't settle for the default because it will probably be much more expensive than if you do a little research and specify one. Also, be sure you HAVE picked SOME kind of plan because if you have no plan at all, your long distance calls can be billed at the highest rate your carrier charges. Even if you make few long distance calls, a couple minute call at the default rate could cost you many dollars.

Here's at least one web site that helps you compare long distance plans available in your area. 

Getting Slammed
You shouldn't be paying more than a dime a minute for long distance calls these days. If you are one possibility is that you have been SLAMMED - that is, a nefarious long distance provider has told your phone carrier to switch you to them (as if you had actually asked for this to happen) and now you will pay higher rates. They do this because this all can be so confusing that the average consumer has no idea that it occurred. You can confirm you long distance carrier very easily: just dial 1-700-555-4141. This free call will tell you who you are signed up with. If it's not who you expect, call your provider. To avoid being SLAMMED, once you've picked a long distance provider, ask your carrier to put a "PIC Freeze" on your account so it can't be easily changed.

Checking your carrier doesn't always work as designed. I am signed up with PowerNet Global. If I dial 1-700-555-4141 on my home phone, I get nothing.  If I dial it from my office phone I get "Your long distance service is now active - 5102".  Real useful. So, I used another tool: I dialled "00". Just like dialing "0" gets your phone carrier's Operator (AT&T Operator Assistance, in my case), 00 calls your long distance carrier's Operator assistance. In my case, the recording says "Welcome to WCLLC" which is just as useful as "5102". In my case, it means that PowerNet Global doesn't really have a network. They resell a major long distance provider - used to be Qwest, now it's Williams Communications Group.

There can be times when you'd want more than one long distance carrier. An example would be that you get the best rates for US calls from CoolTel (your PIC provider) but their rates to Mexico are poor. In this case you can make arrangements with a Dial-Around provider which gives you a toll-free number to call which then provides a second dialtone where you call your party at their rates. There are also 10-10 services which work similarly but there are more likely to be extra charges.

Alternative Carriers
Maybe you don't use AT&T (or other landline carrier). Maybe you use a cell phone for all your calls and have "cut the cable" as they say. These days most cell phone services include free nationwide long distance because they use their own network to carry the call most of the way to its destination. So, for domestic long distance on a cell phone, you don't need to "PIC" a carrier, and the 700 number doesn't do anything.

Perhaps your home uses a cable company (like Cox or Time Warner) or a VoIP provider like Vonage or maybe your business uses a business-line like a T-1 or PRI. In these cases, the rules change because the calls don't necessarily involve the baby bells or other traditional carriers. Quite often, your basic plan includes free long distance. So this means from 1 mile to 3000 miles, there's never a charge no matter how long you talk. If you make a lot of LD calls, this can be something worth considering.

The only reason I have not yet switched to a carrier like Time Warner for my home dial tone is that the traditional phone system has an advantage that the others don't - resiliency. The Plain Old Telephone System, in most cases, especially in the city or suburbs, dedicates a pair of wires just for you, all the way from their central office to your home and to everyone elses. If a pair of wires in the cable goes bad, it may well not be yours. Also, in times of power outages, like during an earthquake, generators and huge 40v batteries at each central office continue to power the lines and thus your ability to make/take calls (your cordless phone won't work if your power is out but a corded one probably will). However, I use my landline so seldom these days that I may soon join the others and take my chances with Time Warner or just with my Verizon cell phone - the only problem with a cell phone is that it's hard to tell someone to "pick up the extension to talk to The Kids".

The Bottom (Phone) Line:
If you have business service with a traditional carrier, like AT&T, and especially if you're a business (vs residential) customer, you now know what those Zone charges are. They're not broken out by the call like Long Distance is but they can cost you a bundle. Check your next phone bill and look for your Local Calls (Zones 1 and 2) to see what they're costing you. Also, look at your Zone 3 calls and any IntraLATA calls and see if a 3rd party carrier could reduce your costs here a bundle.  Residential customers - if you have ZUM billing, this applies to you too.

Filed Under
Communications: Landline -

History In The Making: Analog Broadcast TV Ends Tomorrow, June 12, 2009

We thought we'd heard analog (NTSC) television's last gasp in February, 2009, when essentially all full power TV stations in the US were to cease sending signals they way they have since before Uncle Miltie and Howdy Doody. Then Congress stepped in with a couple puffs of legislative CPR (bailing out the unready, unaware, or clueless, as usual) and put off the inevitable for 60% of these stations until the end of the day, tomorrow, June 12, 2009. Starting June 13, full power TV stations in the USA will only send programming using the ATSC digital format.

If you aren't aware of this transition you're either busy reading (what? and miss "I'm a Celebrity, Get Me out of Here"?) or you're not paying attention. This new method of sending programming digitally means stations can send multiple programs at once (more revenue for the same transmitting cost, and more efficient use of limited radio spectrum) and it means that the quality of the signals will be essentially perfect. I watched the Inaugural Parade on KGTV-DT in January and it looked better than a DVD. The downside is that older TVs can't see this datastream without a converter which is either your cable or satellite connection or is a box you can get with a subisidy from The Government.

The Channel Dance
Part of the shakeup is a musical-channels game that's been going on for awhile. As of Saturday AM, many stations won't be where you expect them to be channel-wise. But, your new DTV-capable TV doesn't care and will handle the changes for you by scanning the TV spectrum and remembering what it sees. Even if you aleady have a DTV set (or a converter) with an off-air antenna you should RE-SCAN on Saturday so your TV learns about the last of the Channel Dance. This FCC-sponsored website has all the info.

A local professional organization has been following the process and says that one local station will continue emitting an analog signal until June 26. This so called "nightlight" service will be, simply, an alert to those who tune to it, reminding them of where everybody went and what to do about it.

Uncle Martin's Headgear is Back In Vogue
I have considered dropping my cable entirely. Mrs. Telecom and I generally only watch 3 channels - HGTV, The Food Channel, and The SciFi Channel. We might be able to get by with the local offair stations and save ourselves around $50 a month. If you elect (or are foced, due to lack of cable where you live) to just watch the local stations, you may need a decent antenna for your roof or attic. San Diego stations are located in two places - atop Mt San Miguel near Spring Valley, and atop Mt Soledad in La Jolla, which are 2 very different directions for most of us. If you are reasonably line-of-sight to both locations, you might get by with a set of rabbit-ears (yes, the things you threw away decades ago when cable came along). I got a nice, reasonably priced set at Radio Shack. If you find the signal isn't strong enough (you either get nothing on channels where you expect it or else you get something but it pixilates or freezes regularly (because DTV doesn't fade-to-snow like analog does) you may need to get a rotor, get two antennas, or aigh and pick one group of stations or the other. Two DTV receiving antennas that are highly recommended by Gary Stigall, Director of Engineering for XETV Fox6 and Editor of San Diego's SBE Chapter 36 Newsletter, are as follows: 

History Being Made
When KGTV-TV Channel 10 turned off their analog transmitter for the last time in February, they had one of their very first engineers push the Plates Off button on the transmitter and they videotaped it for posterity. So what? Well, for us boomers at least, this is a technical milestone. We grew up in a world where digital-anything was SciFi while today it's expected. The first computer I ever programmed on was, literally, brought in on a forklift and we thought the IBM-370/155's 1.5 megabytes of (core) memory was simply wasteful. Now my cellphone (yes, it really is almost like a Federation Communicator, Spock) has more processing power. Even while computers grew up and The Internet went from Geek to boutique, TV remained analog. I remember when long distance phone calls started going digital in the early 1980's - the disappearance of the expected and accepted hiss from analog transmission was quite striking to me. I will not miss analog TV. Digital TV has so many more possibilities - have you seen KNSD-DT's 24/7 weather info on one of their secondary channels? - and it allows other spectrum to be reused for public service, wireless communications, Qualcomm's FloTV, etc., that it's about time.  Still, this is just about the last of the old technology and so you might want to watch Channel 39, 51, or 15 when they pull the plug on Friday night - even take a picture or set the VCR for 11:57-ish PM - so you can tell generations to come how you watched the end of an era.

Filed Under
Communications: Communications Technology -

Just in Case You've Wondered: How Text Messages Get Routed


It used to be “for a good time call 867-5309”. Now it's “for a good time text “DEBAUCHED” to 696969”. Did you ever wonder what those numbers are, who administers them, and how you can use them for business? I did. I think about these things all the time. I'm Dr. Telecom.

Every cell phone has the ability to send 160 character (max) SMS or “text” messages to other cell phones. The address used to route the message is simply the phone number. Since all phone numbers in North America are unique, so are all SMS addresses.

The addresses seen in the ads you see on the TV and other places, entreating you to text a keyword someplace for products, services, media, etc., are a different kind of address that is also routed among the cellular carriers. These are called Common Short Codes and are administered by the CSC Administration (CSCA), part of the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA) http://www.usshortcodes.com/aboutCSCA.html

A business leases a CSC from the CSCA for between $500 and $1000 a month. Once set up, all US cellular carriers can route their subscribers' SMS texts to you or to an Application Provider with whom you've contracted to get the messages and do something with them.

The CSC gets the message to the business or their Application Provider. But the first word in the message sent, known as the KEYWORD, is what typically determines what will happen. If UCAN had the CSC of 11111, they could say “Text CONSUMER to 11111 to start getting our daily Consumer Alert message.” They could also say “Text SPL to 11111 to start getting Sunrise Powerline status alerts.”  The address is the same but a computer program uses the first word as a trigger and responds differently depending on the trigger text received - it stores the email address in a database for that campaign, then replies in some way. UCAN could have hundreds of different campaigns, all from that one CSC account.

I'LL START TEXTING WHEN YOU PRY MY PHONE OUT OF MY COLD DEAD HANDS (or maybe not)
Texting seems to be somewhat generational, IMHO. Most Gen X'ers and younger use it while most of the mid-to-early boomers that I know do not. Personally, as you can probably tell from my blog posts, I tend to be verbose, so 160 characters is a limitation! But also, I prefer to both send and get regular email because I don't want to be interrupted during the day for things that aren't temporally significant. A phone call (or a text message) generally requires my direct involvement when it happens. I also reserve that attention I might give to text message for VERY important things - once and awhile I might text Mrs. Telecom if she's in class so she knows to check the message at an early convenience but it's not as intrusive in a classroom as a phone call and she doesn't use her phone for email, PERIOD. Emails are things I can go thru when I want to. That's me. I don't “text SPOCK to  NCC1701 to get Star Trek trivia sent to your cell phone!” I'm unusual. But, you knew that.

If you're considering using text messages for marketing be sure you only send them to people who have initiated the process. Text messages cost money while emails, if you already have Internet access, are free. Be sure your system has a way to let people unsubscribe.

ALTERNATE APPROACH
Also, know that pretty much all cell phones can receive emails-as-texts. That is, you can send a regular SMTP email to a carrier-specific email address, e.g. 8885551212@carrier.com, and the recipient will get the email as a text message even if they don't have Internet access on their phone (truncated to 160 characters). So, you COULD do a text campaign from email, which would still cost the recipient whatever their plan's per-message cost is, but would cost you nothing. The only problem with this is that it's not SMS round-trip; that is, the consumer can't initiate this relationship by texting but must get to you via a web site or email or other method to get registered and to cancel later on. Verizon users can go here (this was really hard for me to find) to create a more intuitive “nickname” email address.

DO-IT-YOURSELF TEXT CAMPAIGNS
So what if you simply received the text messages for your campaign on your cell phone? This would work but you'd have to reply to each message manually - not very time-efficient. Well, there is a product that appears to automate this process. The one I know if is called SMSFinder by MultiTech.    In this case your subsscribers text to an actual cell phone number because SMSFinder is actually a box with a GSM cell phone in it plus some additional brains. Subscribers might text “CONSUMER” to, say, 8885551212, the unit's cell phone number, in order to have the SMSFinder get the message then do something with it. The SMSFinder owner does not have to lease a CSC address to use this product. Of course, the unit's owner will have to pay their carrier for the text messages. For a small campaign, this might beat the $500 - $1000 a month for a CSC address.

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless -

The World's Greatest Consumer (R?) Cells Himself (Verizon Network Extender tested)

As you remember from last month, I reported on how Verizon and Sprint Wireless customers can improve (or even simply provide) coverage in their homes or businesses. Known generally as a femtocell* this micro-cell-tower is, in essence, a box you place anywhere there's Internet access. It connects Verizon's network to your cell phones locally, via the Internet. Here's a review of the product.

Michael's home's Verizon cellular coverage isn't ideal so we installed one of these units. It was easy. For me, particularly, since he sprung for the one-time $250 fee and I got to play with it.

  • Connect ethernet to Internet router or directly to cable modem or DSL.
  • Connect power
  • Wait at least 10 minutes (maybe up to an hour) for the GPS receiver to lock. This was our only stumbling point - I didn't get a blue GPS light on the box right away so I though we had signal problems.
  • Watch for 4 blue lights on the box.

You're on. How do you know? Because if you dial #48 you'll get a confirmation message. Also, when you make or take a call, if the extender is handling it, you'll hear quick confirmation tones. If you have problems here are some FAQs.

They say that you should place cell phones directly next to the unit for a few minutes so they can get to know each other. We did this with Michael's Samsung Omnia phone and did not do it with my Omnia and both worked.

The unit comes with a cable to allow you to extend the GPS antenna outdoors if necessary. As noted in Step 3 above, I thought we'd have to do this because I didn't get a blue GPS light. Be patient and give it some time before resorting to this.

Data Please?
It appears that the Network Extender will not transmit the faster EVDO (Rev0 and RevA) Internet data format. It appears that it will handle the slower 1X RTT speed data. While Michael's phone was tethered to his laptop, which was running a speed test from http://speedtest.net, I pulled the ethernet cable - the test continued, so the phone must have elected to use the EVDO signal from the cell tower which, though slower than it would be at a better location, was still faster than 1X RTT. Some people have bemoaned this lackof EVDO support. But most people, if they have Internet (as required for the Network Extender) will just use that while home and use the phone while mobile. Many modern Smartphones even have WiFi that you can use to keep it syncronised with your mail server while you're at home or elsewhere with poor cellular data rates.

Multiple Yakkers
The unit provides 4 wireless channels which support 3 concurrent calls (the 4th is reserved for 911 calls). That's fine unless your unit is at an office, or unless you're having a party, or unless you have a BIG family with a LOT of Verizon phones. The product allows you to designate up to 50 Verizon phone numbers as Priority Callers. Verizon customers can enter these numbers via their My Verizon profile on the Internet. Now, non-priority callers can still make a call. But if a priority caller tries to make a call when all 3 channels are busy, a non-priority caller will be bumped to accommodate them.

A Soft Handoff
I wanted to see if the unit would hand me off gracefully to a cell tower when I left its range. I confirmed that I was calling Mrs. Telecom via Michael's Network Extender, left the premises, and never knew I'd been thru a "soft handoff". According to the FAQs, this would not be true the other way - if the unit was in a place where there's NO, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH, cell tower coverage, a call initiated where there WAS coverage would not get handed off as I approached the Network Extender and I'd eventually lose the call.

Michael is pleased with the improved call quality. He's still not "5 bars" at all places in his 3-level home but he's better off than he was.

-----

* A dear friend read my original post and asked "Why is it called a FEMTOcell?". It's kinda dumb really. People talk about mini-this and micro-that to indicate that a newer item is smaller than or is a subset of the original. In the Greek order-of-magnitude prefix system, the next smallest thing (1000th of micro) is "nano". NanoCells, used by Mark From Ork to say Goodbye or as mini cell systems in isolated locations, were already in existence. Then comes "pico". The term picocell was already used to define what's essentially just the radio part of a femtocell. The NEXT smallest prefix, femto (1000th of pico), was thus employed. Its actual value, 10-to-the-minus-15 of something, is irrelevant.

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless - Communications Technology -

The World's Greatest Consumer (R?) Cells Himself (Verizon Network Extender tested)

As you remember from last month, I reported on how Verizon and Sprint Wireless customers can improve (or even simply provide) coverage in their homes or businesses. Known generally as a femtocell* this micro-cell-tower is, in essence, a box you place anywhere there's Internet access. It connects Verizon's network to your cell phones locally, via the Internet. Here's a review of the product.

Michael's home's Verizon cellular coverage isn't ideal so we installed one of these units. It was easy. For me, particularly, since he sprung for the one-time $250 fee and I got to play with it.

  • Connect ethernet to Internet router or directly to cable modem or DSL.
  • Connect power
  • Wait at least 10 minutes (maybe up to an hour) for the GPS receiver to lock. This was our only stumbling point - I didn't get a blue GPS light on the box right away so I though we had signal problems.
  • Watch for 4 blue lights on the box.

You're on. How do you know? Because if you dial #48 you'll get a confirmation message. Also, when you make or take a call, if the extender is handling it, you'll hear quick confirmation tones. If you have problems here are some FAQs.

They say that you should place cell phones directly next to the unit for a few minutes so they can get to know each other. We did this with Michael's Samsung Omnia phone and did not do it with my Omnia and both worked.

The unit comes with a cable to allow you to extend the GPS antenna outdoors if necessary. As noted in Step 3 above, I thought we'd have to do this because I didn't get a blue GPS light. Be patient and give it some time before resorting to this.

Data Please?
It appears that the Network Extender will not transmit the faster EVDO (Rev0 and RevA) Internet data format. It appears that it will handle the slower 1X RTT speed data. While Michael's phone was tethered to his laptop, which was running a speed test from http://speedtest.net, I pulled the ethernet cable - the test continued, so the phone must have elected to use the EVDO signal from the cell tower which, though slower than it would be at a better location, was still faster than 1X RTT. Some people have bemoaned this lackof EVDO support. But most people, if they have Internet (as required for the Network Extender) will just use that while home and use the phone while mobile. Many modern Smartphones even have WiFi that you can use to keep it syncronised with your mail server while you're at home or elsewhere with poor cellular data rates.

Multiple Yakkers
The unit provides 4 wireless channels which support 3 concurrent calls (the 4th is reserved for 911 calls). That's fine unless your unit is at an office, or unless you're having a party, or unless you have a BIG family with a LOT of Verizon phones. The product allows you to designate up to 50 Verizon phone numbers as Priority Callers. Verizon customers can enter these numbers via their My Verizon profile on the Internet. Now, non-priority callers can still make a call. But if a priority caller tries to make a call when all 3 channels are busy, a non-priority caller will be bumped to accommodate them.

A Soft Handoff
I wanted to see if the unit would hand me off gracefully to a cell tower when I left its range. I confirmed that I was calling Mrs. Telecom via Michael's Network Extender, left the premises, and never knew I'd been thru a "soft handoff". According to the FAQs, this would not be true the other way - if the unit was in a place where there's NO, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH, cell tower coverage, a call initiated where there WAS coverage would not get handed off as I approached the Network Extender and I'd eventually lose the call.

Michael is pleased with the improved call quality. He's still not "5 bars" at all places in his 3-level home but he's better off than he was.

-----

* A dear friend read my original post and asked "Why is it called a FEMTOcell?". It's kinda dumb really. People talk about mini-this and micro-that to indicate that a newer item is smaller than or is a subset of the original. In the Greek order-of-magnitude prefix system, the next smallest thing (1000th of micro) is "nano". NanoCells, used by Mark From Ork to say Goodbye or as mini cell systems in isolated locations, were already in existence. Then comes "pico". The term picocell was already used to define what's essentially just the radio part of a femtocell. The NEXT smallest prefix, femto (1000th of pico), was thus employed. Its actual value, 10-to-the-minus-15 of something, is irrelevant.

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless - Communications Technology -

MAKE IT STOP!!! When Phishing Becomes Vishing and The Phone Is No Longer Your Friend

I've received those stupid "Last Chance! Your Car Warranty Has Expired" mailings. And I've received the Car Warranty Renewal telemarketing calls. I once asked them why they were calling me since I was on the National Do No Call list and they said: "Well, you pressed 2 when we called so you must have wanted our call"! I've reported them, each time, to Do Not Call and have listed them on one of the many telemarketer-number posting sites like  whocallsme.com and 800notes.com. Finally, it looks like justice is happening.

According to  the San Francisco Chronicle. one or more of these firms has been busted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  Here's another look at the consumer aspect by (fellow Syracuse University alumnus) Herb Weisbaum at MSNBC.

Phaking Phone Numbers
This ability to "spoof" the Caller ID text (just like spammers "spoof" the FROM: text in their emails), as displayed on your phone and mine, is not something new to Voice Over IP calling. Caller ID text editing has been a feature for digital business trunk line (known in-the-biz as PRI lines) users for some time and this ability is useful because a business using one of these trunks might have several sub-entities each requiring its own CallerID text; some phone systems can even display the private DID number for each employee when that employee makes a call. And very strong laws need to be made to punish abuse of this capability.

The reason that The Nefarious prefer VoIP accounts is that the editing is easier to do and, like a Hotmail email account, these accounts are much cheaper, more
disposable, and harder to trace. Folks like you and me, with landlines
and cellphones, cannot edit what shows up when we call someone - we can
tell the phone company how we want it to appear and, if they think it's
legit, they will comply. They also now have a RECORD OF IT.

One argument for allowing the unsupervised editing of CallerID text, as mentioned in the SF Chronicle article, is for people who NEED to obfuscate their numbers. The example provided (by a company who provides software to allow this!) is a doctor who calls patients from her cell phone but doesn't want the patient to know the cell phone number. My surgeon had no problem giving me his cell phone number, so I guess it's an individual issue, but it can be handled easily by a smart entrepreneur who offers a service allowing doctors (e.g.) to call in, then dial out again - the CallerID will be that of the service. The doctor's own office can easily install a modern phone system allowing him to call in and then back out again; his office CallerID will be displayed - which is ideal - and not his cell phone number. Seems to me that the outbound phone can have CallerID blocking turned on. CallerID can be blocked per-call or globally on your landline (see this article by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse), As for cell phones, the PRC says (see item 12 in the article) that, in most cases, you cannot block your CallerID. I called Verizon Wireless today and they said they CAN do this so it's possible for a doctor (e.g.) to get a cell phone that shows RESTRICTED on the called party's display.

The Bottom Line
is to not do business with telemarketers, to not assume that a caller ID is who/what it says it is (unless it's somone you already know - it's highly unlikely that a telesleaze firm will randomly happen to pick your mother's phone number to display), and to generally look at any phone call from someone you don't know with skepticism until you're SURE they're legit. And, as Herb Weisbaum says, if the seller pushes you to "buy now because the offer expires today!" and/or won't send you a proposal/contract/prospectus first, hang up on them. And no matter how legit they are, if they called you and you were registed with DoNotCall.gov (and they aren't an excepted non-profit, political, or polling organization), they broke the law. Log the call at DoNotCall.

Keywords: caller ID, telemarketing, callerID, Voice Over IP, VoIP, vishing, phishing, CallerID faking, Caller ID editing, spoofing, callerID spoofing, caller ID spoofing, PRI

Filed Under
Communications: Communications Technology - VoIP -
Money & Privacy Consumer Scam -

MAKE IT STOP!!! When Phishing Becomes Vishing and The Phone Is No Longer Your Friend

I've received those stupid "Last Chance! Your Car Warranty Has Expired" mailings. And I've received the Car Warranty Renewal telemarketing calls. I once asked them why they were calling me since I was on the National Do No Call list and they said: "Well, you pressed 2 when we called so you must have wanted our call"! I've reported them, each time, to Do Not Call and have listed them on one of the many telemarketer-number posting sites like  whocallsme.com and 800notes.com. Finally, it looks like justice is happening.

According to  the San Francisco Chronicle. one or more of these firms has been busted by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  Here's another look at the consumer aspect by (fellow Syracuse University alumnus) Herb Weisbaum at MSNBC.

Phaking Phone Numbers
This ability to "spoof" the Caller ID text (just like spammers "spoof" the FROM: text in their emails), as displayed on your phone and mine, is not something new to Voice Over IP calling. Caller ID text editing has been a feature for digital business trunk line (known in-the-biz as PRI lines) users for some time and this ability is useful because a business using one of these trunks might have several sub-entities each requiring its own CallerID text; some phone systems can even display the private DID number for each employee when that employee makes a call. And very strong laws need to be made to punish abuse of this capability.

The reason that The Nefarious prefer VoIP accounts is that the editing is easier to do and, like a Hotmail email account, these accounts are much cheaper, more
disposable, and harder to trace. Folks like you and me, with landlines
and cellphones, cannot edit what shows up when we call someone - we can
tell the phone company how we want it to appear and, if they think it's
legit, they will comply. They also now have a RECORD OF IT.

One argument for allowing the unsupervised editing of CallerID text, as mentioned in the SF Chronicle article, is for people who NEED to obfuscate their numbers. The example provided (by a company who provides software to allow this!) is a doctor who calls patients from her cell phone but doesn't want the patient to know the cell phone number. My surgeon had no problem giving me his cell phone number, so I guess it's an individual issue, but it can be handled easily by a smart entrepreneur who offers a service allowing doctors (e.g.) to call in, then dial out again - the CallerID will be that of the service. The doctor's own office can easily install a modern phone system allowing him to call in and then back out again; his office CallerID will be displayed - which is ideal - and not his cell phone number. Seems to me that the outbound phone can have CallerID blocking turned on. CallerID can be blocked per-call or globally on your landline (see this article by the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse), As for cell phones, the PRC says (see item 12 in the article) that, in most cases, you cannot block your CallerID. I called Verizon Wireless today and they said they CAN do this so it's possible for a doctor (e.g.) to get a cell phone that shows RESTRICTED on the called party's display.

The Bottom Line
is to not do business with telemarketers, to not assume that a caller ID is who/what it says it is (unless it's somone you already know - it's highly unlikely that a telesleaze firm will randomly happen to pick your mother's phone number to display), and to generally look at any phone call from someone you don't know with skepticism until you're SURE they're legit. And, as Herb Weisbaum says, if the seller pushes you to "buy now because the offer expires today!" and/or won't send you a proposal/contract/prospectus first, hang up on them. And no matter how legit they are, if they called you and you were registed with DoNotCall.gov (and they aren't an excepted non-profit, political, or polling organization), they broke the law. Log the call at DoNotCall.

Keywords: caller ID, telemarketing, callerID, Voice Over IP, VoIP, vishing, phishing, CallerID faking, Caller ID editing, spoofing, callerID spoofing, caller ID spoofing, PRI

Filed Under
Communications: Communications Technology - VoIP -
Money & Privacy Consumer Scam -


Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved