T-Mobile 4G Service in San Diego is Significantly Slower than Advertised
A quick visit to T-Mobile USA’s website and you are inundated with information about its 4G service. T-Mobile refers to its “supercharged 4G network” as more than 3 times faster than 3G with “blazing-fast” average download speeds of 10Mbps and peak speeds of up to 27Mbps.
UCAN seeing all of these claims of significant speeds decided to put T-Mobile to the test. Michael Shames with a T-Mobile My Touch 4G in hand traveled to some of his most frequented locations to see if he was receiving the service he was paying for. The result T-Mobile failed miserably. Michael conducted multiple tests at 5 outdoor locations around San Diego and his download speeds averaged a paltry 2.74Mbps not even close to advertised average of 10Mbps and he certainly did not experience anything close to peak speeds. No his peak speed during the test was 7.69 Mbps, below even what is suppose to be the average on the network.
|
LOCATION |
TEST NETWORK DOWNLOAD |
TEST NETWORK UPLOAD |
CONTROL NETWORK DOWNLOAD |
CONTROL NETWORK UPLOAD |
|
|
T-MOBILE 4G |
T-MOBILE 4G |
VERIZON LTE 4G |
VERIZON LTE 4G |
|
HOME |
0.43 Mbps |
0.46 Mbps |
18.20 Mbps |
4.13 Mbps |
|
MISSION VALLEY |
7.69 Mbps |
2.30 Mbps |
22.50 Mbps |
8.40 Mbps |
|
BAY CITY |
2.25 Mbps |
1.08 Mbps |
8.48 Mbps |
2.99 Mbps |
|
MIRA MESA |
3.33 Mbps |
1.02 Mbps |
10.81Mbps |
0.69 Mbps |
|
UCAN OFFICE |
Too slow to register |
Too slow to register |
2.98 Mbps |
1.62 Mbps |
These test results are of great concern to UCAN. Consumers should be receiving much faster upload and download speeds on a 4G network. UCAN will be contacting T-Mobile with the results of its test and asking for an explanation as to why its network appears to not be performing as advertised. UCAN will continue to collect network speed data and monitor the situation going forward. Network quality and speed and important features and consumers should at least know the quality of service they will receive when they are considering what services to sign up for.
According to Rethink Wireless, a recently published study of mobile broadband performance in North, South and Central America by research firm ARCchart reports that Verizon is delivering download speeds in excess of 11Mbps to Android smartphones in many US markets. By comparison, AT&T supports average download speeds of around 2.3Mbps over its HSPA+ network, while Sprint delivers just 1.8Mbps over EV-DO. Despite being the smallest national provider, T-Mobile's HSPA+ network achieves a more respectable average download performance of 3.2Mbps.
The advantage which Verizon enjoys may be short-lived depending on how aggressively AT&T pushes out it LTE network. The carrier is aiming to have LTE in 14 markets by year-end.While Verizon's LTE network puts its rivals to shame, coverage remains limited. ARCchart estimates that roughly half of Verizon's customers have access to LTE, and when it comes to the performance of Verizon's EV-DO and RevA network the tables are turned, with competitor networks showing notably superior performance.
No doubt, one reason Verizon is able to pump such high speeds through LTE is because the spanking new network has only recently been unboxed, and relatively low user numbers means the network's capacity isn't being taxed. It will be interesting to see how performance changes over the coming 12 months as the number of LTE-enabled devices increases and usages ramps. But for now, the Verizon LTE offering appears to be putting other "4G" networks to shame.
Has your experience been similar to UCAN's (or the ARCchart report)? T-Mobile customers let us know your experience with T-Mobile’s 4G service. Are you receiving anything close to 10Mbps download speeds? Have you ever got close to a peak download speed of 27Mbps? Let us know particular if you are in San Diego whether you have found T-Mobile to be living up to its end of the bargain and if not what if anything you have done to try and change the situation. Have you talked to T-Mobile customer service? If so, what did they tell you? Have you tried to cancel you contract? If yes, were you successful? Let us know, post a comment below or email us at contactus@ucan.org.
Around the Web: Sprint upping ETFs to $350
What's worse than paying a $200 ETF with Sprint? Paying a $350 ETF with Sprint!
That's right, ladies and gentlemen, you now have the pleasure of paying one and a half more benjamins to Sprint if you'd like to exit your contract early. According to various blogs around the web (I found this information here), Sprint is raising its ETF on advanced devices starting September 9. Some sources note that Verizon pulled this same stunt just before it released the iPhone. Coincidence? Only time will tell.
Now, we don't really care as much about the speculation of whether the iPhone is going to hit Sprint as much as we do consumers having to pay even more to get out of a contract they do not want to be in. Sure, the ETFs are on par with the other major carriers. But let's consider a system where consumers have more choices, not more fees. Prepaid, perhaps?
Dragging your bill through the MUC - AT&T's new Minimum Usage Charge on long distance accounts
Don't you just love it when companies charge you for absolutely nothing? No service provided, no goods consumed.Nada. Zip. Zilch. Well, that's what AT&T is doing to its long distance customers with something called a Minimum Usage Charge.
Starting in July, AT&T customers who have AT&T as their long distance provider but don't make any long distance calls will be assessed a $2.00 Minimum Usage Charge. Conveniently shorthanded to MUC, this charge just feels like muck on the bills of AT&T landline customers who don't use their long distance. Even worse, the taxes, fees, and surcharges associated with the MUC raise the total cost for no services rendered to around $4.44 per month. At just a shade over $50 a year, that's no small chunk of change.
So what's a savy customer to do? The best thing to do is vote with your wallet--if you remove AT&T as your long distance provider, you will no longer need to pay the muckety MUC charge and give AT&T $50 a year it didn't earn. It's usually best to put a PIC freeze on your account after you make this change so you can avoid any slamming charges. For a great primer on PIC freezes and other phone-related goodies, here's a link to one by our very own Dr. Telecom:
Did you get hit with this muckety MUC charge? Got a complaint about AT&T? Let us know in the comments or fill out one of our online complaint forms.
Summer energy savings graph
Recently a UCAN member brought to our attention an insert that went out in the most recent SDG&E bill. It’s a flyer promoting summer energy savings and what you can focus on to lower your energy consumption.
Although I love that SDG&E is doing its best to educate customers, the graph included is a bit deceptive. Here’s a scanned image of the graph:

Our member was concerned because it appears customers without air conditioning were paying more for lighting and refrigeration than those with air conditioning. SDG&E has correctly labeled their graph, but using a bar graph to show percentages can be misleading.
So we decided to revamp the graph to clarify their point. Here’s a better way to think of your energy consumption:

SDG&E's original chart makes no statement about the relative energy consumption for the two groups. However, let's assume that both types of residences have the same energy habits. Let's say that for refrigeration, lighting, water heating, laundry, cooking, TV, computing, and misc that both types of homes use 100 KW of electricity. For the homes without A/C, 100 KW is 100% of their energy. But for the homes with A/C, 100 KW is only 67% of their energy - - the other 33% is air conditioning. That means the total energy consumption of the A/C home is about 150 KW. So the homes with A/C are using 50% more energy than those without A/C. This graph gives you an even better snapshot of energy consumption:

Hopefully our new graphs give you a snapshot of your energy usage and inspires some ideas of where to look first for summer energy savings.
Prepaid cell phones - which type of plan is right for you?
Here at UCAN, we get lots of calls asking for advice on the best consumer services. Sometimes it's landline service,
other times it's an internet service provider, but lately, the most frequently recurring request is about prepaid phone
service. Maybe it's due to the economy or maybe it's due to consumers tiring of the pain of being in the clutches of a two- year service agreement. Whatever the reason, more and more people are thinking about switching to prepaid phones.
We think this is a fantastic decision, but once you go down the rabbit hole and find yourselves in prepaid wonderland,
where do you start? Do you follow the Cheshire Cat or listen to the sage advice of the hookah-smoking caterpillar? Before you head down any wrong path, have a quick chat with us about where to begin.
With the cornucopia of prepaid cell phone providers out there, it helps to narrow down your choices a bit. The easiest way we've found to do this is to put yourself in one of two categories: are you (1) a heavy talker, or (2) a light talker? A heavy talker is someone who is on their cell phone more often than not, chatting away with friends, shooting off text messages, sending emails, and browsing the web. A light talker is someone who uses their cell phone sparingly--mainly for quick but infrequent calls--and most likely wants to keep a cell phone for emergency purposes.
Using this categorization, you can cut out roughly half of the plans that you need to look at. This blog will cover the general basics of what to look for in either category. I'll post a follow up blog in a few days with our newly revised prepaid phone comparison chart that gives specifics about each of the most popular prepaid carriers available. If you fall into the first category of a heavy talker, you'll want to find a plan that has unlimited services for what you use. If you talk on the phone a lot, you'll want unlimited minutes. Heavy texter? Look for an unlimited texting plan. The same thing goes for data and email. Some carriers do have unlimited everything plans for those who use all these services, while other carriers have a bit more targeted plans with just unlimited talk or unlimited text for those who are more specific with their phone use.
If you fall into the second category of a light talker, you'll want to find a plan that fits your phone use pattern. Unlike the heavy talkers who would be looking for an unlimited plan, light talkers would benefit from a pay-as-you-go plan. While it may seem like the unlimited plans are a better deal, light talkers would end up spending less money with a pay-as-you-go plan because they simply do not use enough minutes for an unlimited plan to be worthwhile. As I mentioned before, some use their phones sparingly for a quick chat--say to find a friend to meet up at the mall. With this type of frequent but light phone use, you'll want to choose a plan that has a relatively low cost per minute. For those users who merely want to keep a cell phone with them in case of an emergency, you'll want to find a plan that has the longest expiration period for your minutes.
Thoroughly confused? Not to worry. This is just a primer on prepaid cell phones. My next blog--complete with our updated prepaid cell phone comparison chart--will give you specific examples of the various plans out there for both the heavy and light talkers.
Have you had a good experience with a prepaid cell phone company? A terrible experience? Let us know about it in the comments.
Paying by smartphone a not-so-smart idea
You can use your smartphone to do just about anything, and now you can buy a flat screen TV with a single screen tap. But is it a good idea? T-Mobile just launched a new service dubbed “Direct Carrier Billing,” which allows users to make purchases on their phone and billed to their T-Mobile account. Consumer attorneys warn that these services don’t offer adequate fraud protection, which means that in a dispute the consumer can be stuck with the bill.
T-Mobile’s service certainly isn’t the first or only cell phone payment device. Paypal, Obopay, Square, Zong, and FaceCash all have applications that allow you to pay by phone. And there’s nothing inherently wrong with using your cell phone to purchase items. Any payment method is subject to loss or theft, but deactivating the phone is as simple as making a call to your service provider, just as you would call your credit card company if you lost your card.
What makes some of these services, like T-Mobile’s, especially risky is not that they come in phone form - - it’s the form of payment that they are backed by. With most services you can choose your form of payment be a credit card, a debit card, your checking account, or in the case of T-Mobile’s service: your wireless bill. By federal law, credit cards offer excellent protection in the event of theft, misuse, or dispute, with limited liability for the consumer. Debit cards offer limited liability to a lesser extent. But your rights in regards to phone bill charges are unclear. Any fraud protections would be based on your wireless carrier’s contract. Consumers Union did an investigation of 19 wireless contracts to see what purchase protections were offered and found that none were as strong as credit/debit card protections. So, say you purchase an item for $50 at Joe’s Shop and it appears at $75 on your statement, or say fraudulent charges appear on your bill. With T-Mobile’s service, you don’t have federal law protecting your liability; you’re at the mercy of T-Mobile’s decision.
There is some good news: if you’re in the state of California, the California Public Utilities Commission provides residents the right to reverse unauthorized charges and bar third party charges from phone bills. And Consumers Union is petitioning wireless carriers to adopt stronger consumer safeguards. Until then, if you choose to make any purchases with your mobile, protect yourself by linking your credit card to the transaction.
Sources:
“New Ways to Pay,” Consumer Reports, September 2011 edition
“T-Mobile payment system leaves users vulnerable, report says,” LA Times, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/08/t-mobile-payment-system.html
We've Moved!
UCAN has moved.
As of August 15, 2011, our new address is:
3405 Kenyon Street, Suite 401
San Diego, CA 92110
(get map from Google)
Looking to cut summer electricity costs? Here’s one consumer product worth its weight in gold.
Nothing is more frustrating than watching your energy bill rise and feeling powerless to stop it. If you call SDG&E they’ll offer you a general energy audit - - useful, but it won’t tell you if you have a problem appliance that’s an electricity glutton. If you call an electrician they’ll inspect your appliances - - but for a pretty penny.
Luckily, there is a way to test each of your appliances without incurring an enormous cost. Normally I refrain from promoting any consumer products through UCAN and, just to be clear, we’re not getting any kickback for promoting this. But if you want to do a guerilla home energy audit, this item is a must have. It’s called the Kill-A-Watt.
The concept is simple - - plug your appliance into the Kill-A-Watt and it will tell you how many kilowatts/hour the appliance uses. This can help you identify what’s hogging your electricity, and you can make informed decisions about what’s worth keeping on, what’s not, and what needs to be replaced. Especially now that we’re heading into the dog days of summer and many are blasting the A/C, you’ll want to make sure there aren’t any surprises when you get your SDG&E bill.
You can pick one of these up at Amazon for around $25 a piece. And if you check your appliance usage and the numbers aren’t adding up to what’s on your SDG&E bill, be sure to fill out an online complaint form and the Fraud Squad will investigate for you.
FCC proposes new rules to reducing cramming
Cramming on phone bills is nothing new, but the FCC is finally beginning to crack down on telecommunication companies for the practice.
For those who aren’t familiar with cramming, it’s the practice of allowing a third party carrier to bill you through your phone bill. The fee may be for a service you signed up for, but a large percentage of them are unauthorized. These charges are typically small and go unnoticed by consumers; often the name of the charge is disguised to sound like some sort of standard fee. One of the most infamous is a small charge named ‘USBI’ nestled between other legitimate regulatory fees.
This practice is profitable for both the third party biller and your phone company. Say that you’re crammed on your AT&T by USBI and end up paying a couple dollars extra each month on your bill. USBI will typically give a cut of the proceeds to AT&T; an extra incentive for AT&T to keep their mouths shut about the practice. Horrifying, isn’t it?
Cramming is one of most blatantly offensive practices phone companies engage in, and up until now the FCC has just paid lip service to the situation. However, that’s beginning to change. Back in Octover 2010 Verizon settled with the FCC for $25 million for cramming, in addition to refunding $50 million to consumers affected by the practice. In June the FCC levied a total of $12 milliion in fines on four cramming companies. The Senate Commerce Committee found that cramming charges total $2 billion annually, and phone companies are getting a cut of the profit.
And now the FCC has officially proposed new rules on phone companies to prevent cramming. Notably, carriers would have to notify their customers of the option to block third party charges, and any third party charges would need to be listed on a separate bill to avoid confusion on the part of the consumer.
I’m thrilled to see the FCC really crack down on this low down, deceitful practice. Be sure to check your phone bill for any unauthorized charges. If you spot one, call your phone company immediately and request it be removed. If you run into any trouble with it, just give us a call at the Fraud Squad: (619) 696-6966.
UCAN's gift offer wildly popular despite the silence of literary critics
Alarmingly, not a single literary critic or economist from
Harvard, Yale, Stanford, or Berkeley have commented on
Michael Shames’ new smash-hit book, Adumbrations of
the World’s Greatest Consumer, now available in paperback.*
Is it academic jealousy?
Is it possible that a wisp of the smoke of jealousy has
entered the hallowed halls of America’s finest learning
institutions?
Or could it be the simple fact that we never sent them
a copy? Or maybe it is because it is only available to
UCAN members when they contribute at the $25 “Bulldog”
level or more. Perhaps they are upset because we haven't
granted them free access to Michael's DOUBLE SECRET
Web Site of priceless Consumer Resources.
We may never know, but the ugly truth is that Harvard, in
particular, has remained stubbornly -- and dare we say loudly -- silent.
Well their loss is your gain. We still have a few copies of
Michael’s wit, wisdom, philosophy, and laugh-out-loud
funny story telling available, but you must act now!
The perfect gift for weddings, Bar Mitzvahs, debutante
balls, housewarmings, birthdays, anniversaries, and important
holidays such as Arbor Day, and National Dust Mite Awareness
Week.
But do hurry. Quantities are limited.
__________________________________________________________________
* Okay, it was never available in hardcover, but still, why the silence?
This story originally appeared the June, 2011 UCAN Watchdog which is distributed to UCAN Members by mail in advance of being published on our Web site.
Utility Consumers' Action Network - (619) 696-6966
Terms and Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be: a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the Fraud Squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved. Remember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use New Media Rights' multimedia studio and equipment for free.







