PEW report confirms broadband Internet is a privilege of the wealthy and educated

art's picture

Broadband Internet is apparently a class-based utility, a privilege of the wealthy and educated. There has been a lot of talk about the Pew Internet and American Life Project's release of its latest study on home broadband adoption. Some groups have used the opportunity to focus on immediate trends in racial, ethnic, age, and rural vs. urban adoption of broadband internet service. However, there are two larger, more important "big picture" issues that should not be ignored, and are essential to assessing the current broadband Internet situation in the United States.

1) The Internet is still a class based utility and service, readily available in the best quality to the wealthy and highly educated, and only marginally available to those who are poorer and less educated.

2) American broadband Internet service continues to lag behind the world in connection speeds, overall penetration of the population, and price.

The clearest divide in adoption of broadband among groups in the United States is along economic and educational lines. For instance, 76% of Americans with an annual income above $75,000 have broadband Internet connections, compared to only 30% of those with an income of $30,000 or less. As to education, 70% of Americans with a college degree have broadband Internet connections compared to 21% of those without a high school degree.

This highlights the fact that while there is legitimate concern about "net neutrality" (ensuring websites and services being treated fairly and equally by the network providers who connect websites and Internet services and their users) in terms of those who are already seated at the Internet table, there are still large gaps in the of the population not even connected to the Internet. While the Internet may not be a physical necessity like water, it is either quickly becoming, or already has become, like electricity, a social, cultural, and (perhaps most importantly) an economic necessity to be a full part of modern society in a developed country.

This is especially true for young people. Unfortunately, this gap in access for the economically and educationally underserved is eerily reminiscent of our two tiered, apartheid educational system.

Even taken as a whole, it is no secret that America is lagging behind broadband connection speeds and penetration rates worldwide. For instance the PEW study shows 71% of Americans have internet connections of any type, and only 47% have broadband connections. Another study from May of 2007, by ITIF, shows broadband penetration in the U.S. at similar levels, or .51 subscribers per household. The leading nations are South Korea with a rate .90, Iceland with a rate of .83, and the Netherlands with a rate of .73 per household. So the leading nations have broadband penetration rates higher than even the United States total Internet penetration rate.

The average broadband connection speed in the United States is 4.4(mbps) (DSL and Cable in the US are significantly slower than this), versus 61.0 in Japan, 45.6 in Korea, 21.7 in Finland, and 18.2 in Sweden.

And if you think users are paying premiums in these countries for higher speed broadband connections, think again. Cost per 1 mbps in the U.S. is $3.33. Cost in the countries listed above is as follows; Japan- $0.27, Korea- $0.45c, Finland- $2.77, and Sweden- $0.63.

Other important points from the PEW study:

  • Broadband adoption has slowed to a crawl of 12%, down from a 40% growth rate from March 2005 to March 2006. (a separate study from Point Topic and OECD supports this contention)
  • Rural broadband access at home OR work is only 38% compared to 56% suburban and 58% urban access to a broadband connection at home or work.
  • 91% of all Internet users send or read email.
  • Only 9% of all Internet users have ever made an online phone call.
  • 29% have read someone else's online journal or blog
  • Only 12% have ever created or worked on their own blog; and
  • Only 17% have ever taken material they found online and mixed it into their own artistic creation.

See the whole PEW study here:

http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband%202007.pdf

Other studies referenced and websites on this issue:

http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0704/
http://www.websiteoptimization.com/bw/0705/
http://www.leichtmanresearch.com/
http://www.netratings.com/
http://point-topic.com/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

If "poor" people could

If "poor" people could afford the internet then they would definetly use it, it has nothing to do with education

internet providers

the fact that while there is

the fact that while there is legitimate concern about "net neutrality" in terms of those who are already seated at the Internet table, there are still large gaps in the of the population not even connected to the Internet.

OMG! Reading and computer use are based on education!!

I'm not sure what this "study" is suggesting. That people with educations read more? That people who own computers use the Internet more? Are we supposed to feel bad or guilty about this? Perhaps someone needs to enlighten us about where the emergency is - if it doesn't reside with the same education and income gap argument that people have been beating their chests about for the last 40+ years. Yes, education is important. Yes, it is important to develop work-based skills that are of high demand to the economy. However no one has been able to provide a clean solution to either of these issues, and they aren't about to figure it out just because people "discover" that uneducated poor people don't use the Internet as much as highly educated rich people.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.




Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!


Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved