Tax proposal means more "Smiles per Mile" ... for the oil industry
"Pay-Per-Mile" automotive tax proposal delivers "More Smiles Per Mile" to Big Oil, but for motorists, it's highway robbery.

Oregon's Governor Theodore Kulongoski is studying a horrifically bad tax concept that is little more than a love-letter to Big Oil. He wants the state to study the idea of taxing drivers for using less fuel.
We call it the "More Smiles Per Mile" tax for the oil industry, because despite claims to the contrary, this tax will ultimately reward Hummer drivers and other gas hogs by taxing vehicles based on the number of miles they travel.
California looked at this road tax a few years ago and decided to pass. But now, according to an article in today's St. Louis Dispatch, Texas, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and Ohio are also contemplating Big Oil's "Smiles Per Mile" tax concept.
Here's the basic idea: Instead of taxing users based on how much gas they use, the tax will be based on how many miles you travel. When you pull up to the pump, the GPS navigational system in your car will be accessed by the gas station. The pump will calculate how many miles you have traveled, and where you have traveled, and tax you accordingly. But that's not all: You will be charged extra if you drove during rush hour, or through a congested area.
Big Oil loves the idea because it rewards wastefulness. And Big Government? Well, they'll be able to keep records on where your vehicle has traveled at all times using a government-mandated GPS locator. This is wonderful news for law-and-order types who want to see a police state where all citizens are monitored at all times.
According to an article in today's St. Louis Dispatch:
"if you want to drive a Hummer, or whatever that vehicle might be 30 years from today, at 7:30 in the morning on I-70, you're going to pay a higher rate ..."
"... In Oregon, Gov. Theodore Kulongoski's proposed budget calls for a task force to work out details of the plan. Eventually, GPS devices could be recording every mile driven, and possibly which routes motorists use. Motorists would pay a mileage tax at the pump in place of a gasoline tax. The state tested the concept in 2006 and 2007 with 285 volunteers and a handful of gas stations in Portland, Ore."
Although boosters of the tax say that a Honda Civic driver will pay less than a Hummer driver, the reality is that Big Oil's "Smiles Per Mile" tax would bring a multiplicity of bad consequences.
8 good reasons why this tax is highway robbery:
1) It will likely reward gas guzzlers. Right now, drivers who use more fuel pay more in taxes. A cement truck, for example, gets terrible mileage. Because it is taxed on a per gallon basis, it pays more in taxes. And a Hummer, a cement truck, or a Chevy Silverado should pay more in taxes because the weight of these vehicles does tremendous damage to the roads.
2) It punishes fuel-efficient drivers. This tax was designed by the oil industry to punish people who drive economy cars. If you're getting 50 miles per gallon because you are driving carefully, and using a light-weight fuel efficient vehicle, such as a Toyota Prius or Honda Insight, you are currently rewarded with a lower fuel bill. This tax punishes you by charging you based on the miles of road you travel. It is therefore regressive. Proponents say they will tax a Civic less, but let's face it, this tax is tailor-made by the oil industry to punish drivers and businesses that are fuel-efficient.
3) It creates a massive bureaucracy. Under the plan, each vehicle, or each class of vehicle, will be taxed differently. It will take an army of meddling bureaucrats and tax collectors to create the tax code and enforce it. And over the years different business groups will lobby for discounts and exceptions. The only people who won't get discounts or exceptions will be YOU, the voter.
4) It's a horrific invasion of privacy: Your vehicle will constantly be monitored by the government. The government will know when, and at what time, you visted your psychiatrist. It will know when, and at what time, you attended that 12-step program, or stopped at your local church to pray. They may even report this data to your insurance company, which would love to raise your rates based on driving patterns, too.
5) Working people will be punished. If you work for a living and can't afford to live close to your office, like the corporate fatcats that invented this disastrous tax, you will pay more for driving during rush hour. That's right: If you are driving your vehicle during certain hours, you will pay a higher tax.
6) It will make it impossible to compare gas prices. Under this system, you won't know what you are going to pay for gas until after you buy your gas. If the proponents of this disaster get their way, you'll pay a variable rate depending on where you've driven, and at what time you've driven.
7) It will be impossible to audit. How do you know you are being charged fairly by the retailer or the government when you are being taxed a different rate for the number of miles you've traveled, the time you've traveled, and the locations you've visited?
Estimating your taxes will be almost impossible without a spreadsheet. And because the taxes will be so complicated, it will make motorists and businesses vulnerable to fraud, overcharges, and abuse.
8) It replaces the gas tax. Ultimately, this proposal is designed to eliminate taxes on gasoline, by replacing them with taxes per mile. No wonder the oil industry is smiling.
This is one road tax that should be kicked to the curb. Otherwise, the Gas Hogs will be lining up at the government trough at your expense.
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network - (619) 696-6966
Terms and Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be: a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the Fraud Squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved. Remember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use New Media Rights' multimedia studio and equipment for free.






how do i stand when i have
how do i stand when i have purchased a new car through a dealer and paid the deposit,waited the 3 months to be told that the car i have ordered can not be supplied which took a phone call on my part to find out this information when all i wanted was to arrange a time to pick up the vehicle. This now mean`s i have lost any advantage of the scrappage scheme .what they did offer was an upgrade for a 1000 pound more which they had in there showroom
new car
how do i stand when i have purchased a new car through a dealer and paid the deposit,waited the 3 months to be told that the car i have ordered can not be supplied which took a phone call on my part to find out this information when all i wanted was to arrange a time to pick up the vehicle. This now mean`s i have lost any advantage of the scrappage scheme .what they did offer was an upgrade for a 1000 pound more which they had in there showroom
Just another shining example
....of country stuffing down ridiculous uneconomical products down our throats. It's just a slight-handed, shady advertising method which offers incentives for buying products we as consumers can barely afford and ones which destroy the environment as well. And the writer isn't kidding when he mentions "Bug Government".... Being able to track and monitor your automobile usage is a giant step in the wrong direction. Although, it may seem like an insignificant move on behalf of the government, if enough of these seemingly harmless policies are set in place our freedom as citizens goes out the window. Do any readers actually agree with such a proposal? Thanks.
Post new comment