Keep up with UCAN.org by following us on Twitter!

Thanks for visiting UCAN.org! Please remember our services are available because of grassroots donations from people like you. Please help us continue our work with a donation of any amountClick here to visit our secure donation page.

Jim Barrett Resigned! - San Diego's water leader steps down

According to a press release on Friday from the Mayor's office, Jim Barrett is resigning from his position as Public Utilities director. After March 26, 2010, Barrett is reportedly moving to be the Assistant General Manager of the Coachella Valley Water District. In his place, Alex Ruiz will be serving as interim director. (Mr. Ruiz was Mr. Barrett's assistant director).

UCAN can't take the credit for sending the director of the City's Water Department to the middle of the desert. But, we can be somewhat cheered by it.   Jim Barrett was an obstacle to meaningful reforms at the department.   He clung to the philosophy that if he kept his head low and off the radar screen that he was doing his job.   But during a time when water and sewer services become more important and impactful upon the region and upon consumers, the department needed new leadership.  

Alex Ruiz has demonstrated some openness to changes and might be a more promising head of the department.  But regardless of who's in charge of the City Water Department, UCAN is committed to making sure that the Water Department sticks to the terms of its settlement with UCAN and that it be responsive to its customers.   Be on the lookout for our inserts in your water bills and keep checking back to our website to keep up to date on our Water Project.

 

Thanks to voiceofsandiego.org for the heads up on this issue (http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/environment/muck/article_9afb6df0-2e2e-11df-9f1a-001cc4c002e0.html?mode=story) and for providing a copy of the release from the Mayor's office (http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/voiceofsandiego.org/content/tncms/assets/editorial/b/b5/60d/bb560d5a-2e2c-11df-b7c0-001cc4c002e0.pdf.pdf?_dc=1268435551).

Filed Under

LTD Financial Services, LP Debt Collectors Consumers Beware

Consumer beware.  LTD Financial Services, LP is a debt collection company that appears to harass consumers whether they owe a debt or not.  One of our UCAN senior members was a victim of this practice.  LTD Financial has a D+ rating with the Houston BBB where as of 3/4/10, 171 complaints were processed over a 36-month period of time.  135 of the complaints were regarding "Billing or Collection Issues".  Our Chinese senior said the company called her incessantly and used abusive tactics to collect a debt she didn't owe.  The company called her neighbors and family members to try to humiliate her into paying the debt. The customer alleged a racial slur was directed at her too. The customer's experiences match a Federal Trade Commission initiated civil penalty settlement against the company in the amount of $1.375 million.  Threats to consumers included garnishing consumer wages, seizing their property, and initiating lawsuits or criminal actions against them if they refused to pay.  The owners and top managers were permanently prohibited from these practices. 

Even though the FTC settlement clearly mapped out what tactics could be used so as not to violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, UCAN assumes based on its member's experiences, that the company's profits throughout the country far outweigh the settlement fine and a D+ BBB rating.  Furthermore, there's a question as to what good settlements do as opposed to putting the "bad actors" out of business and filing charges against owners, directors and top management when a company continues "business as usual".

UCAN's advice is to know your rights, exert them if you're the target of such illegal practices, and post comments on our web site. 

 

 

Filed Under

Wireless Phone resources for the Savvy Consumer

Buying wireless phones is getting more and more complicated, in part, because there are so many choices and so many technological improvements.   How does one keep up?   Answer:  Unless you are in the business, you can't.  BUT, you can use some of the insider secrets of those in the business.

We've found a couple of pretty useful websites around that could give you some insights or unusually good deals for phone service.  They include:

1.  Cell Phone Plans.net -  This site is geared to savvy consumers who want to know more before they buy.   We like some of the content although may not be an unimpeachable source.

2.  Amazon.com -   Believe it or not, Amazon is now a reseller competing with the carriers but also selling their services.  It offers some pretty good deals and customer feedback that will be useful in your deciding upon both hardware and service plans.

3.  Rethink Wireless -  A really excellent, and quite authoritative, source for insider-cellphone news and developments.

4.  Cnet -  A pretty good technical website with some very useful reviews of handsets and other other hardware.

5.  Billshrink.com -  Some useful info on analyzing plans.

Filed Under

Bloom Box -- a bonafide breakthrough or a bombastic boom box?

60 Minutes recently featured a story about a fuel cell generation system offered by Bloom Energy.  Called a "Bloom Box",  it produces electricity from natural gas.   It represents an exciting glimpse into future energy systems.  But is it ready for prime-time today?   Not really -- unless you've got a few hundred thousand dollars sitting around collecting dust. 

Currently, a 100-kilowatt Bloom Box array costs around $700,000 to $800,000, or $7,500 a kilowatt....and this is after incentives that cover around 50 percent of the costs. (This according to Michael Kanelos)  The company claims that within 10 years it can have residential boxes that would cost between $2-$3,000, but that is more wish than will.

Bloom Energy isn't the only fuel cell company.  Panasonic started selling home fuel cells in Japan last year that generate around 1 kilowatt, not enough to power a complete household, for $30,000 before incentives, or $15,000 if you factored in U.S./California incentives. ClearEdge Power has a 5 kilowatt fuel cell that costs $56,000 and drops to the $30,000 to $25,000 range after incentives. Ceres Power in England will come out with a fuel cell made in part with diesel components next year.  Meanwhile, a gaggle of automakers are working on developing fuel cell generators for their cars -- these scaled-down generators could be readily transformed into residential generators and could be available in less than 10 years. 

Another problem:  Bloom Boxes rely upon natural gas as a fuel source.   Bloom Box Buyers (BBBs) will have to contend with fluctuating gas prices.  Currently, natural gas prices are at historical lows.  But it is also a historically very volatile commodity and natural gas buyers all share ulcers and therapy costs from trading in this price-spastic fuel source.   In ten years, natural gas may be very costly....or could continue to be dirt cheap.   Anyone who tells you which way natural gas costs are headed is to be disbelieved.   And methane and biogas generally tend to track natural gas prices.  So those seeking renewable gas sources will be similarly challenged.

Yet another problem:   Bloom Boxes are complex devices.  They contain fans and other mechanical objects and they are an unproven device that will no doubt have some glitches.   In contrast, PV (photovoltaic) cells have no moving parts, have a proven operational record and are usually warranteed to last 25 years or more. One of the big hurdles that Bloom will have to cross is the reliability of the ceramic/zirconium plates inside the fuel cell. According to Kanelos, these plates, which convert gas to electricity, must operate in an 800-degree Celsius environment without becoming distorted or corrupted. User data will be heavily scrutinized. Sources say that the plates have a lifetime of five years: replacement at this pace is contemplated in the 9 to 10 cents a kilowatt hour price. If replacement occurs at a faster rate, it could throw off the costs. Add to that the fact that Underwriters' Laboratory and hundreds of utilities have tested and tinkered with photovoltaic panels and wind turbines for years. Bloom will have to go through the process of utility reliability testing, which will take a number of years, before it can start selling to residential customers.

Granted, offsetting these problems are Bloom's advantages.  It can produce power 24 hours a day whereas PV only produce during the day and wind turbines are only active when the wind is blowing.   Bloom also permits for electric storage;  fuel cells are by their very nature electricity storage devices. They could compete very favorably against expensive lithium and sodium battery technologies.   And Bloom offers some very enticing potential add-ons.  For example, if they add plumbing to the Boxes, they could potentially turn the fuel cells into hydrogen-from-water converters.   This is a Holy Grail capability that could totally transform our energy economy.  

Yes, there is a lot to be excited about.  Fuel cell generation holds great promise.  Bloom Energy certainly is tapping into that excitement.   Whether it delivers more than the General Electrics, Siemens, Ballards, Panasonics, Samsungs, Clear Edges, large multinational automakers, and assorted other large companies pursuing fuel cell technology isn't clear.   What is clear is Bloom Energy pulled off a marketing coup by getting featured on 60 Minutes.  For that accomplishment, alone, they deserve some props.

Filed Under

Ditching the Ball and Chain: A case for pre-paid cell phones

Tired of the same old ball and chain you fall asleep to every night and wake up to every morning? Fed up with the monthly recurring burden you pay the ball and chain just to be able to talk when and where you want? No, this isn't about an over-protective parent or significant other.  We are talking about your cell phone contract. A pre-paid cell phone plan might just provide you with an escape from the monthly  burden.that some refer to as a wireless bill.

With cell phone subscribers nearing the 300 million mark in the United States [http://files.ctia.org/pdf/CTIA_Survey_Midyear_2009_Graphics.pdf], the communication devices have reached a level of ubiquity no one could have ever dreamed. Sadly, the majority of these subscribers still have their ball and chain: a two-year service contract with a wireless service provider. Their expensive monthly bill is a recurring burden that appears to never end; however, when the rays of light begin to peek through from the end of the tunnel, service providers overpower it with flickering LEDs from the latest and greatest free* phones [*with a two-year activation and after a mail-in rebate you'll never get]. And the cycle begins all over again.

Until now. There is hope and respite from the two-year blues. It is free and liberating, with no long term commitment. It is the pre-paid cell phone plan. 

Consider pre-paid plans food from a take-out window and contract plans an all-you-can-eat buffet. At a take-out window, you purchase the food before you eat it. Likewise, with a pre-paid plan, if you want to talk or text, you have to pay before you use it. At a buffet, you eat your food, and then pay your bill at the end of the meal. Similarly, with a contract plan, you first talk and text, then pay your bill at the end of the month. Makes sense, right?

However, with the contract plan, your quoted price isn't always the price you pay every month. You may be hit with various fees and charges, such as Sprint's new Account Spending Limit fee I blogged about earlier. This is like the buffet charging you a fresh food fee--a ridiculous and unnecessary charge.

A pre-paid cell phone plan gives you the freedom and flexibility you deserve. There are no early termination fees, no hidden charges, and no surprises. Why? Because you pay for your service before you use it. Like the take-out window, you can choose the phone plan that best fits your wireless needs. Instead of tens, hundreds, or even thousands of dollars in unnecessary fees and charges, the only money you have to lose is the money you put into your account. 

No matter what your talking or texting habits, there is a pre-paid plan for you. But be careful, because not all plans are alike. As with any other big purchase, accurately assess your wants and needs before taking the plunge with a big purchase. For those of you who use a cell phone sparingly, look for a plan that has a low per minute rate and a long expiration period. For those super talkers and texters, look for an unlimited plan that covers all your communication needs.

Ready to lose the ball and chain and feel the freedom? Use the UCAN articles below to cut the shackle from your leg and sprint away from two-year contracts. The first article is a primer on pre-paid wireless phone plans, and the second article is a comparison chart between the different pre-paid service providers.

http://www.ucan.org/telecommunications/wireless/pre_paid_wireless_service_cell_phone_plans

http://www.ucan.org/telecommunications/prepaid/pre_paid_html_experiment

Filed Under
Communications: Wireless -

Baseline Water Department Fees: Not just a drop in an already large bucket

Rising water costs! Panic! Chaos! Anarchy! Recently, we've received many calls from loyal members and viewers rightfully angry about their high water bills. While we are ramping up to scrutinize City Water & Sewer department rates and operations, we want to give you an explanation of a portion of your bill--specifically, the baseline fees. This post will not be a commentary of the high cost of water, but an informational guide to a portion of your water bill and why that portion is so high.

Arguing the financial benefit, the City switched to a bi-monthly billing cycle in early 2003. This means that instead of being charged for one month per bill, you are charged for two months' water use per bill. Although the City claims bi-monthly billing "will save the Water and Metropolitan Wastewater Departments $630,000 in printing and mailing costs each year," [http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/billing.shtml] it does nothing to soothe the sticker shock when you open a water bill for hundreds of dollars. Bi-monthly billing is important to note because although you are paying the same amount annually, each bill consists of a large payment equivalent of two months' water use.

The City charges you baseline fees on a bi-monthly basis. There are two baseline fees charged on your water bill. The first fee is the baseline water fee in the amount of $35.42.  The second fee is the baseline sewer fee in the amount of $28.64. 

What does this mean to you? If you are a City of San Diego single-family residential water customer, you will pay the City $64.06 every two months--before you use a drop of water! Annually, the baseline fee costs you almost $400 just for the privilege of being able to receive water. Allegedly, the baseline fee reflects the operational costs of maintaining the water infrastructure and excludes the cost of the actual commodity (in this case, water).  This kind of "flat" billing is fairly controversial in utility circles.   Energy utilities, such as SDG&E, have been forced by regulators to charge volumetrically, rather than using flat fees.  That means that the utility must incorporate its operational costs into its rates rather than separating it out into a separate baseline fee.

After the baseline fee comes the volumetric fee, or, the water use and sewer use fees.  These are tacked on top of these baseline fees. These rates vary on the amount of water you use and your type of residence.   They too are controversial as they are not tiered so that customers who use a LOT of water in a wasteful manner pay the same rate per hcf as a very frugal customer who conserves water.   UCAN will be examining both the City's use of a flat baseline fee as well as the very regressive volumetric fees for water.

How can you turn bad news into a positive? Be a vigilant water consumer! Go out and read your meter every month to make sure that the City is charging you the proper amount above the baseline fees. The Water Department's website has a wealth of information that you can use to your advantage. Here's a simple guide to reading your water meter: http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/how.shtml. Additionally, here's a calculator to help give you an estimated bill amount: http://www.sandiego.gov/cgi-bin/water/rates/calculator.pl. Use these tools to keep the City in check and make sure you are paying only for the water you use. An informed customer is a powerful consumer.


Filed Under

2010: Understanding the new Credit Card Rules

There has been a lot of discussion about the Credit CARD Act signed into law in 2009 and largely taking effect in 2010. The discussion revolves mostly around the consumer protections put into place by the legislation.  Some of the most notable and reported changes include: 

21-day grace period -  credit card companies must send their bill to you at least 21 before the billing date. No more getting the bill the day before it’s due. The old rule said providers had to give customers a “reasonable time” to pay the bill, but no one knew what a reasonable time was.

Handling of Holiday Payments - The companies must credit you with on-time payments received the day after a weekend or holiday. Let’s say your due date falls on a Sunday, and the CC provider doesn’t get your payment until Monday. Previously, you’d get hit with late charges. No more.

On-time payments if received by 5pm -   They must credit you with on-time payments received by 5:00 p.m. on the due date. This was hit or miss before. Providers pretty much could decide on a whim whether to hit you with a late charge for payments received at the end of the business day. You normally won’t want to wait until the last minute, but if you have to, consider using registered delivery to verify when the provider received the payment.

Notice about any changes -   Credit card issuers must now give you 45 days’ notice on rate and penalty increases. Previously, the rules said the provider had to give you only 15 days’ notice. The new rules give you more time to switch cards if you don’t like the new rates.

Rate increases only on new balances -  Issuers can't raise rates on existing balances.  They must limit rate increases only to new balances. So, if the provider does increase rates, the increase will apply only to new charges and not to existing balances.

Some of the provisions being discussed include: the notification requirements established, the restrictions on credit to those under 21 years old, whether a cap should have been placed on interest limits, and how the credit card companies may strike back against the new regulations by restricting credit or limiting who is approved for credit, imposing new annual fees, and shortening or eliminating the grace period before interest accrues on a purchase.

Whether or not the credit card companies will take such actions remains to be seen, but missing from the discussion are the miscellaneous provisions which include: studies and reports, procedures to timely settle estates of card holders who pass away, a review of small business credit plans, a review of current financial and economic literacy, and FTC rulemaking on Mortgage Lending. These provisions will not have an immediate (if you can call next February immediate) impact like the other provisions, but as long as Congress continues to feel protecting consumers is important good regulations could result.

Studies and Reports
Studies will be conducted with the results reported to Congress in the next few years. One study with report on the relationship between fluency in the English language and financial literacy and to what extent, if any, those whose primary language is not English are impeded in conducting their financial affairs. Another study will report on the marketing of consumer products with credit offers focusing on who is targeted and the predatory nature of the offers. A third study will report on the cost effectiveness of making available emergency PIN technology at some ATMs to allow users when under duress to alert and summon local law enforcement to the ATM. Lastly, a study will report on interchange fees charged by credit card companies and their impact on the use of credit and its effect on consumers and merchants.

Review of Consumer Credit Plans and Regulations
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Board") must in two years review the effectiveness of this and other consumer credit regulations and the impact that the regulations have had on the companies, consumers, and the relationships between the two. The Board must report its determinations and any changes to regulation to Congress.

Report to Congress on Reduction of Consumer Credit Card Limits
The Board in consultation with the other federal regulators of the financial industry must report on the extent to which creditors have reduced credit limits or raised interest rates on consumer credit cards based on the geographical location of the transaction or identity of the merchant, the type of transactions a consumer makes, and the identity of the mortgage creditor who holds a mortgage loan on the residence of the consumer. The report should determine the number of creditors engaging in the practices, the extent to which the practices impact minorities or low-income consumers, and other relevant information. The report should also include recommendations on any regulatory or statutory changes that are needed to restrict or prevent the practices.

Small Business Credit Plans and Recommendations
The Board is also required to conduct a review on the use of credit cards by small business and the credit card market for small businesses including the terms of the agreements, practices of the credit card issues, and the adequacy of protection against unfair or deceptive practices. A small business information security task force will also be formed to identify the information technology security needs of small businesses and the government and nongovernment organizations that serve those needs.

Financial and Economic Literacy
The Secretary of Education and the Director of the Office of Financial Education of the Department of the Treasury in coordination with the President's Advisory Council of Financial Literature shall evaluate and compile all existing federal financial and economic literacy education programs and develop a strategic plan to improve and expand financial and economic literacy education.

Though these provisions are more research and fact gathering and less direct action, the results and recommendations could have a much greater impact on the credit regulatory landscape then the other sections of the Act. If nothing else, they may generate a lot of important information about credit card companies practices that you the consumer should be aware of.

Filed Under

Water Terror Tales: Horrors Visited upon Customers from San Diego City's Water/Sewer Departments

You live in another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a world of water whose boundaries are that of imagination. There's a sign up ahead - your next stop, the San Diego Water Zone! 
San Diego might not be quite the Twilight Zone, but creepy calamities come about just as often. Being so close to beach and ocean should mean a carefree attitude about water; however, the boundaries of San Diegans' mistreatment are limited only by the imagination of the Water Department. 
Today, we delve into the happenings of the City of San Diego Water Department. Take a walk (or swim, rather) with me through the San Diego Water Zone. Be sure to hold your breath!
 
Meter Problems 
We begin at the intersection of Meter Street and Problem Way. While in most places these roads run parallel, in San Diego these roads cross more than a rookie at bat in the bottom of the ninth in the World Series. Customers struggle valiantly to get professional and respectful help from the City's customer service representatives (CSRs). 
Missing Meter
Meet Marty Mason. A hard-working man, he didn't excel at anything particular, but he knew when the dirt was being thrown in his eyes. Mr. Mason knew he had a water meter. The precious liquid came out of the kitchen tap, dripped in his bathtub if the handle wasn't turned tight, and watered his prize azaleas. What Mr. Mason didn't realize that he was caught... in the Water Zone.
The Water Department told Mr. Mason that his water meter was missing. How could that be? Should it not be obvious to the City that the he has a water meter? Instead of calling Sherlock Holmes (literary fans will recall Holmes's trouble in The Water Meters of Baskerville), this industrious customer dug around and found his meter. When relaying his discovery to a CSR, the customer was met with indifference and disbelief. Only in the Water Zone.
Dirty Meter
The water meter reader plugged along on his daily route. One, five, seven, nine. Two, four, eight, ten. No, the meter reader didn't have an aversion to threes, but those were the numbers of houses whose meters he read. Not every meter, but some of them.
Darla Martinez knew how to count;' she was house number number nine. Ms. Martinez knew her meter wasn't being read, as her monthly water bills would be scary anywhere. But this was the Water Zone. Of course every meter was read. The CSR rudely refuted the customer's assertion and demanded proof of the Water Department's lackadaisicalness. How did the customer know? There was such a thick buildup of grime and gunk on the meter window that he had to furiously scrub at it to read the meter himself. 
Slab Leak Policies 
Sam Leahy opened his water bill and saw his bimonthly use: 550 HCF. Trouble was, his previous peak was 10 HCF. The culprit: a barely noticeable slab leak. This bill unleashed a deluge of events that forced him to pay high water and sewer rates for the better part of a year, despite City customer service rules that dictated otherwise. And after another year of fighting with the City, he found himself at wits end, and still dogged by inflated bills
The City violated its own internal rules in their resolution of this matter and our member didn't receive full compensation for the extra charges he received because of the slab leak. In addition, like many of the Water Department's rules, the CSRs apply customer service rules that aren't made public. Typically, the CSRs provide the customers obscure municipal codes in response to the customers' requests. The CSRs do not provide an explanation of customers charges in plain English.  The City's water and sewer rules are not posted on the City's web site.
Moreover, a slab leak during the winter months provides a one-two combo on your  pocketbook. The City calculates your sewer fee based on your water usage during the winter months. [http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/winter.shtml] Even if you're dazed by the City's quick left jab of excessive water use, keep your guard up because a sneaky right hook is looking to end this unfair fight. The City's right hook lingers and doesn't rear its ugly head until July of the next year, when you are charged your next year's sewer rate. You are charged this higher sewer rate for an entire year, backed in a corner, caught in the ropes, feeling the repeated sting month after month with no available defense. 
Backbilling  
What you're looking at now is a ghost of a woman. Once alive, Mrs. Betty Brown is just a shell of her former self, housing broken memories and the smoldering remains of a fire that once burned brightly. The cause of death? Sickness? Too easy. Accident? Too painless. No, there is one soul-sucking force at the center of the Water Zone: backbilling. The still unresolved fight against an almost $20,000 back bill robbed Mrs. Brown of her cheery disposition.
Backbilling occurs when the Water Department erroneously underbilled a customer in the past. The Water Department's backbilling policy: "One hundred percent of the water used will be billed, no matter how far back the water usage occurred." [http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/procedures.shtml] For some customers, even though it was the Water Department's billing error, the policy reached back almost 20 years! 
One of the many problems with backbilling are the unfairly and unevenly applied rules that pertain to backilling. Certain water customers received favorable payment periods for backbilling, compared to others who had unreasonable repayment terms imposed upon them. Some customers didn't see a resolution of their problem until they contacted their city council representative.
Billing Information and Errors 
This is twenty-first century San Diego. While it lacks the high-tech flying cars and hover crafts touted in 1950s sci-fi movies, Bill Ensign expected the low-tech to be ever pervasive. Specifically, City's ability to use a simple calculator to calculate his average water use.
Customers have problems with the Water Department's estimated billing system. For some, certain months were billed at an estimated usage much lower than their typical use. However, their bills were extremely high in following months. The customers' payments drastically fluctuated up and down over the months, making it impossible to create a budget that is necessary in this horrible economy. Often, customers have difficulty getting information about billing errors and correcting their billing errors. Specifically,  In another case, although the Water Department acknowledged the billing errors in another customer's bill, it took over two months to remedy back charges for failure to read his meter.
Rude Customer Service
An escape from the time-warp merely catapults us into the sinewy web of customer service. Any struggle merely vibrates the web to alert the CSR spiders that a helpless consumer is near. Many customers' problems are exacerbated by poor and unprofessional customer service. Customers have difficulties with CSRs. 
One longtime water customer had a lateral sewer line on his property that was the Water Department's responsibility. However, the Water Department changed its policy without notifying the customer and said that he was responsible for any repairs. UCAN formally intervened and ultimately the City was willing to modify its position.  But without our personal intervention, this customer probably would have continued to get a run-around. Countless customers only get help after speaking with their city councilmember in order to get action and resolution. The CSRs should be able to professionally and courteously handle these problems without intervention from a higher power.
Prop 218  
Mr. and Mrs. Peter Tillow, quiet and kind retired folk on a fixed income, whose lives hung in a perfect financial balance. They had enough money to send funny monkey cards for their grandchildren's birthdays and to eat languid dinners at the chicken pot pie shop. When Mr. Tillow casually tossed what seemed to be an innocent piece of junk mail, their once perfect balance skewed drastically out of proportion. Mr. and Mrs. Peter Tillow, once perched on the outskirts, just entered the San Diego Zone.
The Water Department did not provide sufficient notice of public hearing to protest the Water Department's rate hike. The protest form came in a third class mailing that looked like bulk mail and was easily lost amongst daily mail advertisements. Many people tossed the notice along with the pile of credit card applications and millions of dollars of sweepstakes winnings they receive every day, denying them the opportunity to keep their precious finances in balance.
New Account Charge 
Nancy Anderson sat shiva for her dear mother. Once the seven days were up, Ms. Anderson set about the arduous task of winding up her mother's affairs. Choking back alligator tears, she grabbed the piles of paper in her mother's antique armoire and escaped to the sanctuary of her own home. A San Francisco resident, Ms. Anderson hit no bump or obstacle during her task, until she entered the San Diego Water Zone. 
Customers are upset because every time the name on the account changes, the Water Department charges a new account charge. Specifically, a customer's sewer rates went up when she changed account to her name from deceased mother's after she moved into her house. This storyline sounds like it was stolen from Poe, but I assure you there are no beating hearts thumping below the slab (although, that would explain some of the slab leaks). When a parent dies, a death certificate is required to waive the new customer fee. Customers are not told about this requirement when they call a CSR. 
Additionally, another customer owns a rental property and every time the tenant moves out, she transfers the water bill to her name so the water isn't shut off. Each time she transfers the water bill, she is charged a new account charge fee, even though she has owned the building for 40 years.
Escape?
You've now braved and escaped the Water Zone, a rare victory not shared by the San Diegans trapped within the depths of the watery world. What you've seen could be the continuation of an endless nightmare. But with your help, San Diegans can wake up from this never-ending nightmare and escape the San Diego Water Zone. UCAN needs your stories and experiences to help expose all of the Water Department's surly practices. Send in your complaints with the City of San Diego Water Department. Let us know how you survived the Water Zone and lived to tell the tale.

You live in another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound but also really wet......well, if you are near a faucet or toilet.  So join us on a disburbing journey into a world of water and sewer service in the City of San Diego whose bureaucratic machinations and obstructions transcend the imagination. There's a signpost up ahead - your next stop, the San Diego Water Zone!

San Diego's Metro Wastewater and Water departments might not be quite the Twilight Zone; for San Diego residents who have had to deal with these departments, the experiences are more horrific than anything suffered by a Rod Serling character. The boundaries of San Diegans' mistreatment are apparently limited only by the imagination of these bureaucracies. 

Do any of the following stories seem familiar? If so, there's something you can do about it. So take a walk (or swim, rather) with us through the San Diego Water Zone. Be sure to hold your breath!

Note: while the names have been changed to protect the victims, their stories are horrifyingly real. 

Meter Problems 

We begin at the intersection of Meter Street and Problem Way. While in most places these roads run parallel, in San Diego these roads cross more than a rookie at bat in the bottom of the ninth in the World Series. Customers struggle valiantly to get professional and respectful help from the City's customer service representatives (CSRs). 

Missing Meter

Meet Marty Mason. A hard-working man, he didn't excel at anything particular, but he knew when dirt was being tossed in his eyes. Mr. Mason knew he had a water meter. The precious liquid came out of the kitchen tap, dripped in his bathtub if the handle wasn't turned tight, and watered his prize azaleas. What Mr. Mason didn't realize that he was caught... in the Water Zone.

The Water Department told Mr. Mason that his water meter was missing. How could that be? Should it not be obvious to the City that the he has a water meter? Instead of calling Sherlock Holmes (literary fans will recall Holmes' trouble in The Meters of Baskerville), this industrious customer dug around and found his meter somewhat covered in soil. When relaying his discovery to a City CSR, the customer was met with indifference and disbelief. Only in the Water Zone.

Dirty Meter

The water meter reader plugged along on his daily route. One, five, seven, nine. Two, four, eight, ten. No, the meter reader didn't have an aversion to threes, but those were the numbers of houses whose meters he read. Not every meter, but some of them.

Darla Martinez knew how to count; she was house number number nine. Ms. Martinez knew her meter wasn't being read, as her skyrocketing monthly water bills would be scary anywhere. But this was the Water Zone. Of course every meter was read, the CSR insisted when Darla called. The CSR rudely refuted the customer's assertion and demanded proof of the Water Department's undersight. The proof: there was such a thick buildup of grime and gunk on the meter window that she had to furiously scrub at it to read the meter herself.  The meter reader couldn't have possible read the meter without X-ray glasses.

Slab Leak Policies 

Sam Leahy opened his water bill and saw his bimonthly use: 550 HCF. Trouble was, his previous peak was 10 HCF. The culprit: a barely noticeable slab leak. This bill unleashed a deluge of events that forced him to pay high water and sewer rates for the better part of a year, despite City customer service rules that dictated otherwise. And after another year of fighting with the City, he found himself at wits end, and still dogged by inflated bills

The City violated its own internal rules in their resolution of this matter and our member didn't receive full compensation for the extra charges he received because of the slab leak. In addition, like many of the Water Department's rules, the CSRs apply customer service rules that aren't made public. Typically, the CSRs provide the customers obscure municipal codes in response to the customers' requests. The CSRs do not provide an explanation of customers charges in plain English.  The City's water and sewer rules are not posted on the City's web site.

Moreover, a slab leak during the winter months provides a one-two combo on your pocketbook. The City calculates your sewer fee based on your water usage during the winter months. [http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/winter.shtml] Even if you're dazed by the City's quick left jab of excessive water use, keep your guard up because a sneaky right hook is looking to end this unfair fight. The City's right hook lingers and doesn't rear its ugly head until July of the next year, when you are charged your next year's sewer rate. You are charged this higher sewer rate for an entire year, backed in a corner, caught in the ropes, feeling the repeated sting month after month with no available defense. 

Backbilling  

What you're looking at now is a ghost of a woman. Once alive, Mrs. Betty Brown is just a shell of her former self, housing broken memories and the smoldering remains of a fire that once burned brightly. The cause of death? Sickness? Too easy. Accident? Too painless. No, there is one soul-sucking force at the center of the Water Zone: backbilling. Here, the City was to blame, committing the simple but unforgivable mistake of undercharging Mrs. Brown for over a decade. That seemingly simple mistake, through no fault of Mrs. Brown, created an almost $20,000 back bill and robbed her cheery disposition. 

Backbilling occurs when the Water Department erroneously underbills a customer in the past. The Water Department's backbilling policy: "One hundred percent of the water used will be billed, no matter how far back the water usage occurred." [http://www.sandiego.gov/water/rates/procedures.shtml] For some customers, even though it was the Water Department's billing error, the policy reached back almost 20 years! 

One of the many problems with backbilling are the unfairly and unevenly applied rules that pertain to backilling. Certain water customers received favorable payment periods for backbilling, compared to others who had unreasonable repayment terms imposed upon them. Some customers didn't see a resolution of their problem until they contacted their city council representative. Thankfully, UCAN's decisive-thinking and quick-acting team broke through the Water Zone and helped significantly lower Mrs. Brown's bill to a reasonable level.

Billing Information and Errors 

This is twenty-first century San Diego. While it lacks the high-tech flying cars and hover crafts touted in 1950s sci-fi movies, Bill Ensign expected that the City's utilities had at least mastered the use of a calculator. He had the audacity to use his own to calculate his average water use--why didn't the City? 

Bill is one of many customers who have problems with the Water Department's estimated billing system. For some, certain months were billed at an estimated usage much lower than their typical use. However, their bills were extremely high in following months. The customers' payments drastically fluctuated up and down over the months, making it impossible to create a budget that is necessary in this horrible economy. UCAN once again donned its SCUBA suit to rescue another victimized customer and worked with the City to fix its estimated billing formula.

Additionally, customers have difficulty getting information about billing errors and correcting their billing errors. In another case, although the Water Department acknowledged the billing errors in another customer's bill, it took over two months to remedy backcharges for failure to read his meter.

Rude Customer Service

Please take note of an underground pipe, which in this instance serves as a pawn of power. A mere 30 foot stretch amongst more than 3,000 miles of pipe, yet this pawn dealt the crushing blow to Mr. Roger Simons. Mr. Simons' problem stems from a lateral pipe, a changed policy, and a sprinkle of the City's imagination.

Mr. Simons has a lateral sewer line on his property that was the Water Department's responsibility. However, the Water Department changed its policy without notifying the customer that he was now responsible for any repairs. Numerous phone calls to the department resulted in headaches and frustration, but no help.   UCAN formally intervened and ultimately the City was willing to modify its position.  But without our personal intervention, this customer probably would have continued to get a run-around. Countless customers only get help after speaking with their city councilmember in order to get action and resolution. Many customers' problems are exacerbated by poor and unprofessional customer service. Customers have difficulties with CSRs. The CSRs should be able to professionally and courteously handle these problems without intervention from a higher power.

Prop 218  

Mr. and Mrs. Peter Tillow, quiet and kind retired folk on a fixed income, whose lives hung in a perfect financial balance. They had enough money to send funny monkey cards for their grandchildren's birthdays and to eat languid dinners at the Chicken Pie Shop. When Mr. Tillow casually tossed what seemed to be an innocent piece of junk mail, their once perfect balance skewed drastically out of proportion.  Little did they know that in tossing the junk mail,  they had given away their right to vote in a referendum on a proposed water rate hike.   Mr. and Mrs. Peter Tillow, once perched on the outskirts, just entered the San Diego Water Zone.  

It turns out that thte Water Department did not provide adequate notice of public hearing to protest the Water Department's rate hike. The notice informing consumers of their right to protest  came in a third class mailing that looked like bulk mail and was easily lost amongst daily mail advertisements. Many people tossed the notice along with the pile of credit card applications and millions of dollars of sweepstakes winnings they receive every day, denying them the opportunity to keep their precious finances in balance.

New Account Charge 

Nancy Anderson sat shiva for her dear mother. Once the seven days were up, Ms. Anderson set about the arduous task of winding up her mother's affairs. Choking back her tears, she packed the piles of paper in her mother's antique armoire and escaped to the sanctuary of her own home. A San Francisco resident, Ms. Anderson hit no bump or obstacle during her task, until she entered the San Diego Water Zone.  Her mistake -- an attempt to change the name on her deceased mother's water bill.

Customers are understandably upset because every time the name on the account changes, the Water Department imposes a new account charge. Specifically, Nancy's sewer rates went up when she changed account to her name from deceased mother's after she moved into her mother's house. This storyline sounds like it was stolen from Poe, but I assure you there are no beating hearts thumping below the slab (although, that could explain some of the slab leaks). When a parent dies, a death certificate is required to waive the new customer fee. Customers are not told about this requirement when they call a CSR. 

Additionally, another customer owns a rental property and every time the tenant moves out, she transfers the water bill to her name so the water isn't shut off. Each time she transfers the water bill, she is charged a new account charge fee, even though she has owned the building for 40 years.

Escape from the Twilight Zone?

You've now braved and escaped the Water Zone, a rare victory not shared by the San Diegans trapped within the depths of the watery world. What you've seen could be the continuation of an endless nightmare. But with your help, San Diegans can wake up from this never-ending nightmare and escape the San Diego Water Zone. UCAN needs your stories and experiences to help expose all of the Water Department's surly practices. Send us your complaints with the City of San Diego Water Department. Let us know how you survived the Water Zone and lived to tell the tale.  And we'll make sure that your story doesn't happen to other consumers -- plus we may be able to fix your problem with the City.

Filed Under

Consumer Alert - DirecTV Complaints On Rise

UCAN has received many complaints about DirecTV from disgruntled consumers. If you're a victim of DirecTV, please file an online complaint with UCAN's Fraud Squad. If you signed up for a bundled AT&T / DirecTV package in California, you may also want to file a complaint with the California Public Utilities Commission at https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/cimsapp/

Among the abuses reported to UCAN and elsewhere on the Internet are:

Misleading advertising - DirecTV entices new viewers with ads for low prices in big print while hiding a multitude of fees, planned rate changes and other terms in print too small to read.

ETF - DirecTV locks consumers into a two-year contract with a $480 early termination fee without disclosing the terms or even its existence. DirecTV, often without notice or authorization, then charges the consumer's credit card or debit card (tied to a checking account) for the ETF plus hundreds more in equipment fees when the consumer cancels DirecTV.

Rebate confusion - In order to obtain a promotional rate, customers sometimes have to submit a rebate. Customers who submit the rebate form after installation may be charged full price for their service for up to two months. Those who fail to return the rebate within 60 days of an order are charged the full price indefinitely – even if DirecTV failed to adequately inform them of the need to mail the form.

Charging for "free" services, installation and upgrades - The company advertises “free” installation and upgrades such as an HD receiver, DVR receiver or premium channels such as HBO and Starzz. In fact, customers may be required to pay monthly fees for the equipment. The premium channels are offered as a free trial that automatically converts into a paid subscription.

Contract extensions - DirecTV not only requires customers to agree to an extended contract at the beginning of service, but attempts to extend those terms even further. The company extends the length of contracts when customers require equipment repairs, upgrade equipment or move.

Undisclosed financing requirements - DirecTV fails to disclose that the company’s least expensive package of $29.99 per month is only available to customers who meet certain financing conditions and agree to have the costs automatically charged or debited.

Protection plan - Many customers are not aware they have been signed up a $5.99 monthly "protection plan" which DirecTV may charge $10 to cancel.

Non-return of deposit - DirecTV requests a customer's Social Security Number to run a credit check. Those who do not provide their SSN or those who do not pass the credit check may be required to pay a $200-$300 deposit to get service.  Those who cancel service prior to the end of their contract lose part of the deposit and may also be charged cancellation fees.

Misleading promises of cash back - DirecTV ads show promises of cash back from $50 to $200 for referrals or moving, but consumers do not get any cash. Instead, they may get a $5 or $10 bill credit over several months.

Filed Under
Communications: Cable & Satellite TV -

AT&T U-verse: Glitches, Gotchas and Gratitude

Time Warner - San Diego.   Alias Roadrunner.   Alias Slime Mourner.   This cable company goes by a number of names, but the game is the same:  pretty high speed Internet service.  Extensive TV content.   Decent digital phone service.  Embarassingly bad customer service.  Ridiculously high prices and low value.

Just for comparison purposes, consider the neighboring cable company,  Cox Communications.   Cox offers four Internet packages ranging from  $21 per month (for 1.5mps) to $58 per month (for a blazing 30mps).   In between, is a particularly well priced 12.5 mps offering for $31 per month.    Time Warner's internet service -- you've got just one option at $52 per month.   Yikes!  Oh, and they charge extra if you want a wireless router added to that.    But since Cox and Time Warner don't compete,  Time Warner is free to charge those high prices for its mediocre broadband service that comes with its vaunted lousy customer service.

Enter AT&T U-verse.   I was grateful for it because, at a minimum, it kept Time Warner's prices from being that much higher.  So thank you AT&T.   I ordered it within the first month that it came to San Diego back in 2006.   Sadly, it didn't go well.  They were effectively still alpha testing at that point and the slow speeds, poor equipment and complex installation was simply no match for cable service.  Within a few months, I tired of the glitches and canceled the service.    Back,  I went grudgingly, to Time Warner.

But I wasn't going to STAY with Time Warner.  Oh no.   A few price increases transpired and by early 2009, I figured AT&T had worked out the kinks and was ready to go head to head with Time Warner.   I jumped ship back to U-verse in March 2009.

They still had their very friendly and dilgent installer team - most all of them have been nice and accommodating folk.  They had upgraded their equipment and the installation went smoothly.  The savings was about 10-15% over Time Warner's prices with some extra perks, such as whole-house DVR capabilities and a wireless router built into the price.   So far so good.

Then it got bad.  The DVRs starting failing.  In 9 months, I went through three of them.  The gateway (AT&T's verse of the cable modem) failed after 7 months and also had to be replaced.   The wireless router is oddly unreliable.   Sometimes it doesn't work and then mysteriously fixes itself.   The repair process is a bit infuriating.  Even the technie guy that came out to replace one of the broken DVR boxes was pulling his hair out dealing with the level 2 tech support (based somewhere in India) that made the service repair guy go through contortions before concluding -- as we had done one hour earlier -- that the gateway had gone bad.   Ugh!  Then the gotcha:  AT&T's promotional offer ended and they jacked my monthly rate up by $15!  I'd had enough.

So is AT&T Uverse the white knight coming to the rescue of distressed Time Warner customers?  Not really.  They are giving it a moderately effective try but the clunky equipment and complex technology is occasionally headache inducing.    While I'd contemplated switching back to the Roadrunner Dark Side, I've not actually made that humiliating crawl back.   Instead,  I came up with an alternate strategy.

Let's just keep this between you and I, right now.  As this is sort of an experiment.  Here it is:  I'll be increasing the U-verse speed up to 12 mps (appx. $45 per month).  Then I'll cancel all of the TV service.  I've begun using Magic Jack for my phone service.  (connected to a cordless phone network, and I've now got phones in most of the rooms in my house).   Then with a Warpia PC USB to TV wireless adapter ($99),  I'm able to send the Internet directly to my TV.  Click here to read about my Internet instead of Cable options.    Goodye overpriced cable channels.  Hello Hulu, Comedy Central, CNN, You Tube and any other web-based content provider.   So broadband service combined with extensive web-based content seems like a better deal than $120-150 per month to Slime Mourner. 

Stay tuned.  I'll let you know how this particular strategy plays out.

Filed Under


Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved.