Friday, November 14, 2014
General Rate Case (GRC) proceedings currently take place every three years. The GRC will set the amount of money that utilities such as SDG&E can collect through rates. These revenues recover the utility's operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation, and taxes and provide a ‘reasonable’ profit to the utility.
UCAN’s Policy Position:
Working closely with technical and financial experts, UCAN thoroughly examines SDG&E’s application and identifies wasteful spending of ratepayer dollars and isolating expenses that should be shouldered by SDG&E’s shareholders instead of ratepayers. Some of the issues we have identified include:
-unrealistic customer sales and forecasts
-unnecessary funding of new projects
-unusual accounting changes that warrant further investigation
During the last SDG&E GRC (2012) the efforts of intervenors such as UCAN reduced the amount of money that SDG&E was allowed to collect by $115 Million.
UPDATE: September 11, 2015, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
UCAN, SDG&E, and most of the other parties involved in SDG&E’s GRC have agreed to a settlement which is currently being considered by the CPUC. If accepted the settlement will
Reduce the amount of money that SDG&E is allowed to collect by nearly $100 Million
Keep open SDG&E branch offices in Oceanside, National City, and Downtown which SDG&E wanted to close
Set a fair “Service Establishment Fee” of $5.85 for new customers (SDG&E wanted to charge some customers $25)
Capped spending on unforeseen costs for certain gas programs including SDG&E’s Transmission Integrity Management Program (TIMP) and Distribution Integrity Management Program (DIMP). If SDG&E exceeds certain limits on this spending, they will have to justify any further expenses through a new proceeding. Previously, SDG&E was allowed to do the work and seek funding approval after the money was spent, leading to a lower level of scrutiny and potentially more wasteful spending by SDG&E.
November 17, 2014, SDG&E Files Application – SDG&E seeks approval for $1.911 Billion in revenue.
December 22, 2014, UCAN Files Protest – UCAN cites numerous issues in need of further evaluation including the reasonableness of SDG&E’s costs, proposed spending on capital improvements, proposed accounting changes, and SDG&E’s shifting of financial risk from shareholders to ratepayers.
January 6, 2015, UCAN and TURN File Joint Prehearing Conference Statement – UCAN and The Utility Reform Network (TURN), a San Francisco based consumer advocacy group, filed a statement attempting to prevent SDG&E’s efforts to limit the time allowed for consumer groups to investigate and challenge this spending increase.
January 8, 2015, Prehearing Conference – UCAN is represented by Executive Director Don Kelly.
February 5, 2015, CPUC Issues Scoping Memo – CPUC more closely agrees with timeline proposed by UCAN and TURN than by SDG&E. A timeline for the various stages of the proceeding is established with a final decision expected in January 2016
February 9, 2015, UCAN Files Notice of Intent – UCAN affirms its opposition to SDG&E’s application, focuses challenge on rate making, SDG&E’s forecasting of customers and sales, customer service, regulatory accounts, electric generation, and other issues.
April 1, 2015, CPUC Notice of Reassignment – CPUC reassigns case from Commissioner Carla Peterman to President Michael Picker.
June 1-10 2015 Public Participation Hearings in San Diego, Escondido, Oceanside, and El Cajon.
June 22- July 15, 2015, UCAN Executive Director Don Kelly participates in Evidentiary Hearings in San Francisco, presenting testimony and cross-examining SDG&E expert witnesses
September 11, 2015, UCAN joins Joint Motion for Adoption of Settlement Agreements for SDG&E and SoCal Gas
July 1, 2016, DECISION ADDRESSING THE GENERAL RATE CASES OF SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS