Sunrise Powerlink final decision nears -- preliminary decisions are promising

UCAN News

October 31st turned out to be a pretty good day for opponents of SDG&E's Sunrise Powerlink case.    Two preliminary decisions were issued today.   The proposed decision written by Administrative Law Judges Steven Weissman and Jean Vieth concluded that SDG&E had not made a persuasive case for the $1.7 billion+ project.   They recommended that the Commission reject the SDG&E proposal.   They relied heavily upon the facts presented by UCAN that the line was uneconomic and was inferior to the alternatives.  

The assigned Commissioner in the case,  Dian Grueneich, offered a competing decision for consideration by the Commissioners.    She adopted most of what the judges wrote, but suggested a potential compromise.   SDG&E could potentially build a powerlink through the southern portion of San Diego  (but not through Anza Borrego Desert State Park), she pointed out.   But only upon the condition that SDG&E could prove that the line would be used primarily for renewable power.   Her detailed conditions place the onus upon SDG&E to prove that renewable power in the Imperial Valley exists, that it is cost-effective and that the line would be used to ensure that 33% of all power used by SDG&E was renewable.   This is a 60% increase over the state mandated 20% renewable requirement that comes due in 2010.

Oral argument on the case is scheduled for November 7th in San Francisco  (link to the webcast of that argument) and a final decision sometime in December.

The outstanding question at this time is whether yet another alternate decision will be proposed by another Commissioner.   It is expected that Commission president Michael Peevey will put forth another proposal that is more favorable to SDG&E but, so far, that potential alternate has not surfaced. 

The good news is that regardless of what alternate decision is finally issued by the CPUC,  UCAN plans to appeal the decision to the Court of Appeals and ultimately overturn the CPUC decision.   The evidentiary record in this case is so strongly against the construction of Sunrise that all of Sempra's political manipulations to get the Schwarzenegger CPUC to approve it will not likely survive scrutiny by the courts.   So the Sunrise saga is expected to continue for many years, hence.

For more information about the controversial Powerline project,  go to UCAN's full Sunrise web page.

 

Filed Under

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <p> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <!--break-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options




Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!

Utility Consumers' Action Network

(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.

Terms & Conditions

UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.

That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.

See our Terms of Use, Privacy, and Copyright complaint policies as well as our Content Reuse Policy, Some Rights Reserved.